NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2009 › Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2009—Page 1 of 2

Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2009—Page 1 of 2

printed as Table 2 · source pages 97–98 · nlrb2009_p0097_t0

Stitched from pp. 97–98.

Number of cases showing specific allegationsPercent of total cases
Subsections of Sec. 8(a): Total cases16,541100.0
8(a)(1)2,46114.9
8(a)(1)(2)1641.0
8(a)(1)(3)4,56327.6
8(a)(1)(4)1540.9
8(a)(1)(5)7,23243.7
8(a)(1)(2)(3)1030.6
8(a)(1)(2)(4)10
8(a)(1)(2)(5)950.6
8(a)(1)(3)(4)3592.2
8(a)(1)(3)(5)1,2187.4
8(a)(1)(4)(5)200.1
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)130.1
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5)510.3
8(a)(1)(2)(4)(5)30
8(a)(1)(3)(4)(5)830.5
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)210.1
Recapitulation
8(a)(1)16,541100.0
8(a)(2)4512.7
8(a)(3)6,41138.8
8(a)(4)6544.0
8(a)(5)8,72352.7
B. Charges filed against unions under Section 8(b)
Subsections of Sec. 8(b): Total cases6,367100.0
8(b)(1)5,01778.8
8(b)(2)440.7
8(b)(3)2814.4
8(b)(4)3355.3
8(b)(5)30
8(b)(6)50.1
8(b)(7)330.5
8(b)(1)(2)4677.3
8(b)(1)(3)1412.2
8(b)(1)(5)20
8(b)(1)(6)130.2
8(b)(2)(3)40.1
8(b)(3)(5)10
8(b)(1)(2)(3)140.2
8(b)(1)(2)(5)10
8(b)(1)(2)(3)(6)50.1
8(b)(1)(3)(5)(6)10
Recapitulation
8(b)(1)5,66188.9
8(b)(2)5358.4
8(b)(3)4477.0
8(b)(4)3485.5
8(b)(5)80.1
8(b)(6)240.4
8(b)(7)330.5
B1. Analysis of Section 8(b)(4)
Total cases 8(b)(4)335100.0
8(b)(4)(A)195.7
8(b)(4)(B)16549.3
8(b)(4)(C)133.9
8(b)(4)(D)12737.9
8(b)(4)(A)(B)51.5
8(b)(4)(B)(C)41.2
8(b)(4)(A)(B)(C)20.6
Recapitulation
8(b)(4)(A)267.8
8(b)(4)(B)17652.5
8(b)(4)(C)195.7
8(b)(4)(D)12737.9
B2. Analysis of Section 8(b)(7)
Total cases 8(b)(7)33100.0
8(b)(7)(A)927.3
8(b)(7)(B)13.0
8(b)(7)(C)2369.7
Recapitulation
8(b)(7)(A)927.3
8(b)(7)(B)13.0
8(b)(7)(C)2369.7
C. Charges filed under Section 8(e)
Total cases 8(e)15100.0
Against unions alone853.3
Against employers alone426.7
Against both320.0
D. Charges filed Section 8(g)
Total cases 8(g)19100.0

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the various allegations is greater than the total number of cases.

0 of 71 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 97. Three printed columns; the stub column has no printed heading, and there is a single heading level. The crop ends mid-table: the second "Recapitulation" block breaks off after the 8(b)(2) line, and the caption marks this as "Page 1 of 2", so the remaining 8(b) recapitulation lines (and any footnote text) continue on the next page. No section line "A. Charges filed against employers under Section 8(a)" is printed on this page — the 8(a) block begins directly under the column headings — although the parallel line "B. Charges filed against unions under Section 8(b)" is printed (with two spaces after "B." in the original; normalized to one here). The first "Recapitulation" carries a raised 1 footnote marker, recorded as "Recapitulation^1"; the footnote's text is not printed within this crop, so `footnotes` is empty. In the percent column several small values are printed as a bare "0" rather than "0.0"; transcribed as printed. All figures were legible; nothing was computed or corrected.

p. 98. Three printed columns (stub + two data columns); the stub has no printed heading. This crop is "Page 2 of 2" of Table 2, so the body continues a table begun on the preceding page — the first rows shown here (8(b)(3) through 8(b)(7)) belong to the earlier, unlabelled section A of the table, whose section heading and earlier rows are not on this image. Apparent internal inconsistency, transcribed as printed: the upper section gives 8(b)(4) = 348 cases, while section B1 gives "Total cases 8(b)(4)" = 335 (the B1 percentages are consistent with a base of 335). Similarly the B1 detail rows (19, 165, 13, 127, 5, 4, 2) and the Recapitulation rows (26, 176, 19, 127) differ, as expected given the footnote about multiple allegations per case. The section-heading lines (B1., Recapitulation, B2., Recapitulation, C., D.) are centred across the full table width and carry no values; their data cells are empty. The footnote marker 1 appears only on the first "Recapitulation" heading (after B1), not on the second. All section/heading lines are printed with a wider space after the letter-number label (e.g. "B1. Analysis"); normalised to a single space here.

Source image

Source page 97 of NLRB FY2009 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2009, p. 97.
Source page 98 of NLRB FY2009 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2009, p. 98.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.