NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2007 › Time Elapsed for Major Case Processing Stages Completed, Fiscal Year 2007; and Age of Cases Pending Decision, September 30, 2007

Time Elapsed for Major Case Processing Stages Completed, Fiscal Year 2007; and Age of Cases Pending Decision, September 30, 2007

printed as Table 23 · source page 186 · nlrb2007_p0186_t0

StageMedian days
I. Unfair labor practice cases:
A. Major stages completed -
1. Filing of charge to issuance of complaint96
2. Complaint to close of hearing104
3. Close of hearing to administrative law judge's decision69
4. Receipt of briefs or submissions to issuance of administrative law judge's decision29
5. Administrative law judge's decision to issuance of Board decision840
6. Originating document to Board decision610
7. Assignment to Board decision517
8. Filing of charge to issuance of Board decision1173
B. Age of cases pending administrative law judge's decision, September 30, 2007
1. From filing of charge296
2. From close of hearing52
C. Age of cases pending Board decision, September 30, 2007
1. From filing of charge829
2. From originating document282
3. From assignment213
II. Representation cases:
A. Major stages completed -
1. Filing of petition to notice of hearing issued1
2. Notice of hearing to close of hearing14
3. Close of hearing to Regional Director's decision issued22
4. Close of pre-election hearing to Board's decision issued695
5. Close of post-election hearing to Board's decision issued102
6. Filing of petition to-
a. Board decision issued365
b. Regional Director's decision issued39
7. Originating document to Board decision186
8. Assignment to Board's decision131
B. Age of cases pending Board decision, September 30, 2007
1. From filing of petition318
2. From originating document159
3. From assignment97
C. Age of cases pending Regional Director's decision, September 30, 200791

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 This median does not include cases in which the Board denied requests for review.
Reader’s notes

p. 186. Two printed columns: the stub ("Stage") and "Median days". The roman numerals I. and II. sit in a hanging indent of the stub column, not in a separate column, so they are kept at the front of their row labels. Indentation irregularities, transcribed as printed: under II.A, the sub-items "a. Board decision issued" and "b. Regional Director's decision issued" belonging to "6. Filing of petition to-" are set at a shallower indent (flush with the A./B./C. level) than the numbered items around them; their leader dots also stop short of the column rule. The final row "C. Age of cases pending Regional Director's decision, September 30, 2007" carries a value directly (91) rather than being a value-less section line like the other lettered headings. "1173" (I.A.8) is printed without a digit-grouping comma, as transcribed. The apostrophes in "judge's", "Director's" and "Board's" are typographic in most lines and a straight quote in the line "B. Age of cases pending administrative law judge's decision..."; all are rendered as a plain apostrophe. The superscript 1 on II.A.4 is the footnote marker. Nothing appears cut off: the table rule, the last body row and the footnote are all within the crop.

Source image

Source page 186 of NLRB FY2007 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2007, p. 186.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.