Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 2007

p. 144. 18 columns: stub plus 3 columns under "All C cases" (Number, Percent of total closed, Percent of total method) and 2 columns each (Number, Percent of total closed) under CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG and CP cases. The crop ends after "Supreme Court action"; the table clearly continues on the following page (no "Total" closing the body, and no footnote block is printed on this image). Footnote marker 1 appears on the caption (excluded per instructions) and marker 2 on the "CD cases" heading, but neither footnote's text is printed within the crop, so `footnotes` is empty. In the "Total number of cases closed" row, the "Percent of total method" cell holds a short double-hyphen dash rule ("--"), transcribed as "" per the dash-rule convention. No misprints detected: every printed percentage I checked is consistent with the corresponding number divided by its column or method total (e.g. 433/642 = 67.4, 7,051/16,983 = 41.5, 7/12 = 58.3). Row labels that wrap in print were joined: "After issuance of complaint, before opening of hearing"; "After hearing opened, before issuance of administrative law judge's decision"; "Adopting administrative law judge's decision (no exceptions filed)". Typographic apostrophes in "judge's" were rendered as plain apostrophes. Printed indentation showing the hierarchy was not preserved in the label text.

p. 145. 18 columns: stub, then All C cases (Number / Percent of total closed / Percent of total method), then Number and Percent-of-total-closed pairs for CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG and CP cases. This crop is a continuation page ("—Continued" in the caption), so the body begins mid-table with the Withdrawal block; the earlier methods of disposition (e.g. settlement/adjustment and Board/court-ordered categories) are on the preceding page. In the "Percent of total method" column the last two rows ("10(k) actions ..." and "Otherwise (compliance ...)") are printed as a short double dash "--" rather than a number; following the dash-rule convention these are transcribed as empty cells. The two indented lines under "By Board decision" ("Adopting administrative law judge's decision (no exceptions filed)" and "Contested") are sub-rows of that line, and the "Before issuance of complaint" / "After issuance of complaint ..." lines appear twice, once under Withdrawal and once under Dismissal; indentation levels are not preserved in the stub text. Arithmetic was not checked or corrected; all figures are as printed. Image quality is good and no cell was illegible.