Formal Actions Taken in Unfair Labor Practice Cases, Fiscal Year 2007

p. 127. 14 columns: stub, \"Cases in which formal actions taken\", \"Total formal actions taken\", CA, CB, CC, CD-Jurisdictional disputes, CD-Unfair labor practices, CE, CG, CP, CA combined with CB, C combined with representation cases, Other C combinations.\n\nDOUBTFUL CELLS (most important item): the row \"Initial ULP hearings\" is internally inconsistent as printed. I read CA = 10, CB = 2, CC = 2, and transcribed them as read, per the instruction not to correct. But those cells cannot be right: the row's 11 type-of-case cells then sum to 31 against its own printed total of 162, and the \"Hearings completed, total\" line above (CA 152, CB 11, CC 2) minus \"Backpay hearings\" (4, 0, 0) and \"Other hearings\" (15, 1, 0) requires CA = 133, CB = 10, CC = 2 — which would make the row total exactly 162. So either the source misprints these cells or I misread them at the available resolution (I cannot zoom). Treat \"Initial ULP hearings\" CA and CB as unverified; the arithmetically implied values are 133 and 10. Every other row and column in the table cross-foots correctly under this transcription.\n\nDash cells: the following cells are printed with a short dash rule (\"--\", meaning not applicable) rather than being blank, and are transcribed as \"\" per instruction — \"10(k) notices of hearings issued\" in CA, CB, CC, CD-Unfair labor practices, CE, CG, CP, CA combined with CB, C combined with representation cases, Other C combinations; and the CD-Jurisdictional disputes cell of \"Complaints issued\" and of \"Backpay specifications issued\".\n\nGenuinely empty cell: in the second \"Backpay decisions\" row (the one under \"Adopting administrative law judges' decisions (no exceptions filed):\"), the CB cell is blank — no dash, no zero — while the rest of the row is filled; transcribed as \"\".\n\nRow structure: \"Upon consent of parties:\" and \"Adopting administrative law judges' decisions (no exceptions filed):\" are label-only section lines. \"Contested:\" is a section heading that nonetheless carries its own values (2, 2, 2, 0 ...), transcribed as printed. The \"Adopting ...\" label wraps over two printed lines and is joined; the source sets it with a double space in \"(no exceptions filed)\", normalized to one space. The apostrophe in \"judges'\" is a typographic right quote in print.\n\nFootnote: the single footnote line is clipped by the bottom edge of the crop — only the upper sliver of the letters is visible. The word pattern (short word, \"of\", long word) reads as \"terms of definitions\"; the wording is my best reading and the trailing period is inferred. The footnote marker 1 is attached to the caption, which is excluded from this transcription.