NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2006 › Time Elapsed for Major Case Processing Stages Completed, Fiscal Year 2006; and Age of Cases Pending Decision, September 30, 2006

Time Elapsed for Major Case Processing Stages Completed, Fiscal Year 2006; and Age of Cases Pending Decision, September 30, 2006

printed as Table 23 · source page 184 · nlrb2006_p0184_t0

StageMedian days
I. Unfair labor practice cases:
A. Major stages completed -
1. Filing of charge to issuance of complaint93
2. Complaint to close of hearing105
3. Close of hearing to administrative law judge's decision80
4. Receipt of briefs or submissions to issuance of administrative law judge's decision31
5. Administrative law judge's decision to issuance of Board decision470
6. Originating document to Board decision308
7. Assignment to Board decision248
8. Filing of charge to issuance of Board decision739
B. Age of cases pending administrative law judge's decision, September 30, 2006
1. From filing of charge347
2. From close of hearing50
C. Age of cases pending Board decision, September 30, 2006
1. From filing of charge1517
2. From originating document905
3. From assignment837
II. Representation cases:
A. Major stages completed -
1. Filing of petition to notice of hearing issued1
2. Notice of hearing to close of hearing14
3. Close of hearing to Regional Director's decision issued22
4. Close of pre-election hearing to Board's decision issued105
5. Close of post-election hearing to Board's decision issued141
6. Filing of petition to-
a. Board decision issued332
b. Regional Director's decision issued42
7. Originating document to Board decision151
8. Assignment to Board's decision124
B. Age of cases pending Board decision, September 30, 2006
1. From filing of petition575
2. From originating document444
3. From assignment365
C. Age of cases pending Regional Director's decision, September 30, 2006273

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 This median does not include cases in which the Board denied requests for review.
Reader’s notes

p. 184. Two printed columns: the stub ("Stage") and "Median days"; the vertical rule falls to the left of the median-days figures only. Within the stub the Roman numerals I. and II. sit at a deeper-left indent than the lettered and numbered lines, but there is no column rule between them, so each Roman-numeral line is transcribed as one stub label ("I. Unfair labor practice cases:", "II. Representation cases:"). Section lines I.A, I.B, I.C, II.A, II.B and II.6 carry a label and no value; II.C ("Age of cases pending Regional Director's decision, September 30, 2006") does carry a value, 273, and is the last body line before the footnote rule. The sub-items under II.6 are printed as "a." and "b." at a deeper indent; they are kept as separate rows. Apostrophes are set as typographic curly marks everywhere except "judge's" in line I.B, which is printed with a straight apostrophe; all are transcribed as a plain apostrophe. The raised 1 at the end of II.A.4 ("Close of pre-election hearing to Board's decision issued") is a footnote marker and is written as ^1. The footnote line is at the very bottom edge of the crop and slightly clipped at the baseline, but fully legible. Nothing else appears cut off; no totals are printed in this table.

Source image

Source page 184 of NLRB FY2006 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2006, p. 184.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.