Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 2006

p. 140. Grid is 18 columns: stub + "All C cases" (Number, Percent of total closed, Percent of total method) + seven two-column blocks (CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG, CP), each Number and Percent of total closed. Only the "All C cases" block has the third "Percent of total method" column; for every other block that column does not exist, so values were kept under the headings they are printed below. In the first body row ("Total number of cases closed"), the "All C cases / Percent of total method" cell prints a short double dash ("--"), i.e. not applicable; per the dash-rule convention it is transcribed as an empty cell. The crop ends with a rule below "Supreme Court action"; no footnote text appears on this image even though the caption carries a raised 1 and the CD heading a raised 2, so the footnote block (and the remainder of the table, which normally continues with withdrawn/dismissed sections) lies outside the crop. The raised 2 on "CD cases" is recorded as CD cases^2. Internal arithmetic checks out everywhere I tested (component rows sum to their subtotals, case-type Numbers sum to the All C Number, and percentages match the printed bases), so I found no apparent misprints.

p. 141. 18 columns: stub, then All C cases (Number, Percent of total closed, Percent of total method), then Number / Percent of total closed for each of CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG, CP. The "Percent of total method" cell is printed as a short dash "--" (not a value) for the last two rows, "10(k) actions (see Table 7A for details of dispositions)" and "Otherwise (compliance with order of administrative law judge or Board not achieved—firm went out of business)"; both are transcribed as "". The "CD cases" column heading carries a raised 2 footnote marker, but the text of footnote 2 is not printed on this crop (only footnote 1 appears); it is presumably on another page. This is a "—Continued" page, so the earlier rows of Table 7 (and its total lines) are on the preceding page; the body here begins at "Withdrawal" and the table ends with no grand-total row on this image. Row labels are printed with hanging indentation indicating hierarchy (e.g. the five stage lines under "Withdrawal", and "Adopting administrative law judge's decision (no exceptions filed)" / "Contested" under "By Board decision"); the indentation is not represented in the cell text. All printed percentages are internally consistent with the printed counts (e.g. 7,522/7,602 = 98.9; 48/44.0% implies ~109 CD cases closed, matching 20/18.3 and 15/13.8), so no misprints are suspected.