NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2006 › Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2006

Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2006

printed as Table 2 · source pages 120–122 · nlrb2006_p0120_t0

Stitched from pp. 120–122.

Number of cases showing specific allegationsPercent of total cases
Subsections of Sec. 8(a): Total cases16,887100.0
8(a)(1)2,56115.2
8(a)(1)(2)1240.7
8(a)(1)(3)5,09730.2
8(a)(1)(4)1210.7
8(a)(1)(5)6,80740.3
8(a)(1)(2)(3)1000.6
8(a)(1)(2)(4)30
8(a)(1)(2)(5)850.5
8(a)(1)(3)(4)4102.4
8(a)(1)(3)(5)1,3868.2
8(a)(1)(4)(5)280.2
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)40
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5)650.4
8(a)(1)(3)(4)(5)860.5
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)100.1
Recapitulation
8(a)(1)16,887100.0
8(a)(2)3912.3
8(a)(3)7,15842.4
8(a)(4)6623.9
8(a)(5)8,46750.1
B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)
Subsections of Sec. 8(b): Total cases6,140100.0
8(b)(1)4,65875.9
8(b)(2)400.7
8(b)(3)3195.2
8(b)(4)4517.3
8(b)(5)30
8(b)(6)40.1
8(b)(7)671.1
8(b)(1)(2)4908.0
8(b)(1)(3)801.3
8(b)(1)(5)50.1
8(b)(2)(3)20
8(b)(3)(5)10
8(b)(3)(6)20
8(b)(1)(2)(3)140.2
8(b)(1)(2)(6)30
8(b)(1)(3)(5)10
Recapitulation
8(b)(1)5,25185.5
8(b)(2)5498.9
8(b)(3)4196.8
8(b)(4)4797.8
8(b)(5)100.2
8(b)(6)90.1
8(b)(7)701.1
B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)
Total cases 8(b)(4)451100.0
8(b)(4)(A)316.9
8(b)(4)(B)28062.1
8(b)(4)(C)81.8
8(b)(4)(D)10924.2
8(b)(4)(A)(B)143.1
8(b)(4)(A)(C)10.2
8(b)(4)(B)(C)30.7
8(b)(4)(A)(B)(C)51.1
Recapitulation
8(b)(4)(A)5111.3
8(b)(4)(B)30267.0
8(b)(4)(C)173.8
8(b)(4)(D)10924.2
B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)
Total cases 8(b)(7)67100.0
8(b)(7)(A)1217.9
8(b)(7)(B)46.0
8(b)(7)(C)4871.6
8(b)(7)(A)(B)11.5
8(b)(7)(A)(C)23.0
Recapitulation
8(b)(7)(A)1522.4
8(b)(7)(B)57.5
8(b)(7)(C)5074.6
C. Charges filed under Sec. 8(e)
Total cases 8(e)32100.0
Against unions alone2578.1
Against employers alone515.6
Against both26.3
D. Charges filed Sec. 8(g)
Total cases 8(g)32100.0

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the
  2. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the
  3. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the various allegations is greater than the total number of cases.

0 of 72 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 120. The crop cuts off the bottom of the page: footnote 1 breaks off mid-sentence after \"Therefore, the total of the\", and the body of section B appears to continue past 8(b)(7) onto the next page (no closing rule or further rows are visible below it). No \"A. Charges filed against employers under Sec. 8(a)\" section line is printed between the column headings and the first data row on this image, even though the parallel \"B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)\" line is present; the first panel simply begins with \"Subsections of Sec. 8(a): Total cases\". The two centered full-width lines (\"Recapitulation^1\" and \"B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)\") span the whole table width and carry no values. Percent cells for 8(a)(1)(2)(4), 8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4) and 8(b)(5) are printed as a bare \"0\" (no decimal), transcribed as printed. The 8(a) recapitulation percentages sum to well over 100 because a case may be counted under several subsections, as footnote 1 explains; nothing was computed or corrected.

p. 121. This is a continuation page: the crop opens mid-table with the column headings reprinted, so the rows above 8(b)(1)(2) are on the preceding page. The table is cut off at the bottom of the crop. The final "Recapitulation" section shows only 8(b)(4)(A) and 8(b)(4)(B); the parallel 8(b)(4)(C) and 8(b)(4)(D) lines presumably continue on the next page. Footnote 1 is likewise truncated by the crop — it breaks off after "Therefore, the total of the", and the remainder of its text (and any further footnotes) is not visible. The centered section lines "Recapitulation^1", "B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)" and "Recapitulation" are printed as full-width banners between horizontal rules, with no values; they are given here as label-only rows. The superscript 1 after the first "Recapitulation" is the footnote marker; the second "Recapitulation" banner carries no marker. In the percent column, six cells are printed as a bare "0" (no decimal) rather than "0.0": rows 8(b)(2)(3), 8(b)(3)(5), 8(b)(3)(6), 8(b)(1)(2)(6) and 8(b)(1)(3)(5). Transcribed as printed. Possible internal inconsistency, transcribed as printed and not corrected: the Recapitulation line gives 8(b)(4) = 479, while the B1 panel below gives "Total cases 8(b)(4)" = 451. The B1 panel is internally consistent (31+280+8+109+14+1+3+5 = 451; its own recapitulation 51 and 302 also reconcile), so the two 8(b)(4) counts appear to rest on different definitions rather than a scanning error. No cells were illegible; the scan is clean vector-quality text throughout.

p. 122. This crop is a continuation page ("—Continued"): the first two rows, 8(b)(4)(C) and 8(b)(4)(D), belong to a section (analysis of 8(b)(4)) that began on the preceding page, so no section heading precedes them here. The column headings are printed on this page and are transcribed as one heading level; the stub column has no heading. "Recapitulation" carries a raised 1 footnote marker. All cells are clearly legible; no doubtful digits. Internal consistency checks are satisfied as printed (B2 components 12+4+48+1+2 = 67; the 8(e) components 25+5+2 = 32), so no apparent misprints.

Source image

Source page 120 of NLRB FY2006 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2006, p. 120.
Source page 121 of NLRB FY2006 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2006, p. 121.
Source page 122 of NLRB FY2006 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2006, p. 122.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.