NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2005 › Injunction Litigation Under Sections 10(e), 10(j), and 10(l), Fiscal Year 2005
Injunction Litigation Under Sections 10(e), 10(j), and 10(l), Fiscal Year 2005
| Total proceedings | Injunction proceedings | Total dispositions | Disposition of injunctions | Pending in Appellate Court Sept. 30, 2005 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total proceedings | Pending in Appellate Court Oct. 01, 2004 | Filed in Appellate Court fiscal year 2005 | Total dispositions | Granted | Denied | Settled | Withdrawn | Pending in Appellate Court Sept. 30, 2005 | |
| Under Sec. 10(e) total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Under Sec. 10(j) total | 9 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 8(a)(1)(3) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(a)(1)(3)(5) | 4 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 8(a)(1)(5) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Under Sec. 10(l) total | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(b)(4)(B) | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(b)(7)(C) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0 of 44 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
Reader’s notes
p. 168. Layout: the page prints the table as two stacked panels, each with its own full heading block over the same ten columns. Per the one-table rule the headings are given once (from the upper panel) and the lower panel's body rows follow the upper panel's row. The lower panel's heading block is identical except that its three dated columns read "Pending in District Court Oct. 01, 2004", "Filed in District Court fiscal year 2005" and "Pending in District Court Sept. 30, 2005" instead of "Appellate Court"; the lower panel's "Filed in District Court fiscal year 2005" heading carries a raised footnote marker 1 (i.e. "Filed in District Court fiscal year 2005^1"). The upper panel (Sec. 10(e)) is the Appellate Court panel; all rows from "Under Sec. 10(j) total" down belong to the District Court panel. Footnote: the superscript 1 marker appears in the lower panel's heading, but no footnote text is printed within this crop (the image ends at the closing rule below the 8(b)(7)(C) row), so `footnotes` is empty. Stub: neither panel prints a stub heading; the cell above the row labels is blank in both heading levels. Apparent misprint, transcribed as printed: in row "8(a)(1)(3)(5)" the "Total proceedings" cell reads 4 while the same row shows Pending 0 and Filed 5 (which would give 5); correspondingly the three 10(j) component rows' Total proceedings sum to 8 against the printed "Under Sec. 10(j) total" of 9. All other columns in that block foot correctly (Filed 1+5+3=9, Total dispositions 1+4+2=7, Granted 4, Denied 1, Settled 2, Pending Sept. 30 2), and the whole 10(l) block foots exactly. Digits throughout are crisp; no cell was doubtful.
Source image
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.