Analysis of Methods of Unfair Labor Practices Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 2005

p. 127. Column structure: stub + "All C cases" (Number, Percent of total closed, Percent of total method) + seven two-column panels (CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG, CP cases; Number and Percent of total closed each) = 18 columns. The cell at row "Total number of cases closed", column "All C cases / Percent of total method" is printed as a short double-hyphen dash ("--", not applicable); per the dash-rule convention it is transcribed as an empty cell. The crop is the bottom of the page: the body ends with "Circuit court of appeals decree" and the two footnotes, so the remaining methods of disposition (withdrawal, dismissal, etc.) that normally follow in this table are not on this image. The caption carries footnote marker 1 ("Fiscal Year 2005^1") and the "CD cases" column heading carries marker 2; the marker on the heading is retained, the caption is omitted as instructed. All arithmetic cross-checks pass: each "All C cases / Number" equals the sum of the seven case-type panels (e.g., 20,250+6,017+343+105+36+34+72 = 26,857), and the hierarchy sums are internally consistent (9,689+33 = 9,722; 4+505+231 = 740; 147+358 = 505). No suspected misprints. Minor rounding-only artifact: under "Compliance with", the "Percent of total method" subitems sum to 99.9 rather than 100.0 (0.5+68.2+31.2), transcribed as printed.

p. 128. Continuation page: the first body row ("Supreme Court action") is the tail of a section begun on the preceding page, so no section header or grand-total row appears in this crop. Column layout: 18 columns = stub + "All C cases" (Number, Percent of total closed, Percent of total method) + seven two-column blocks (Number, Percent of total closed) for CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG and CP cases. The "CD cases" spanner carries footnote marker 2; the caption (excluded) carries marker 1. Doubtful cells: in the last column (CP cases, Percent of total closed), the values on the "By administrative law judge's decision" and "By Board decision" rows are rendered by the scan with a malformed leading glyph that could be read as "B.0"; given the CP "Number" entries in those rows are 0 and every adjacent percent is 0.0, they are transcribed as "0.0". Low risk, but flagged. Internal consistency (as printed, not corrected): the Withdrawal and Dismissal stage detail sums reproduce their printed section totals in every case-type column. The "Percent of total method" detail under Dismissal sums to 99.9 rather than the printed 100.0, which is ordinary rounding. Row-label spacing was normalized where the typesetting left a double space ("decision (no exceptions filed)"); apostrophes in "judge's" are printed with mixed curly/straight glyphs and are rendered uniformly as a straight apostrophe.

p. 129. This is a continuation page of Table 7; only the last two body rows of the table appear on this crop, but the column headings are reprinted in full, so header_rows is populated. The table has 18 printed columns: the stub plus three columns for "All C cases" (Number, Percent of total closed, Percent of total method) and two columns each (Number, Percent of total closed) for CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG and CP cases. In the "All C cases — Percent of total method" column both rows print a short double-dash ("--", meaning not applicable) rather than a value; following the dash-rule convention these cells are transcribed as "". The superscript 1 in the caption (omitted per instructions) is the marker for footnote 1; the superscript 2 on the "CD cases" heading is retained as "CD cases^2". Footnote 2 ends without a period, as printed.