NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2005 › Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2005

Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2005

printed as Table 2 · source pages 107–109 · nlrb2005_p0107_t0

Stitched from pp. 107–109.

Number of cases showing specific allegationsPercent of total cases
Subsections of Sec. 8(a): Total cases18,304100.0
8(a)(1)2,72714.9
8(a)(1)(2)1480.8
8(a)(1)(3)5,86832.1
8(a)(1)(4)1310.7
8(a)(1)(5)7,12838.9
8(a)(1)(2)(3)1060.6
8(a)(1)(2)(4)20
8(a)(1)(2)(5)840.5
8(a)(1)(3)(4)4032.2
8(a)(1)(3)(5)1,4728.0
8(a)(1)(4)(5)350.2
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)80
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5)740.4
8(a)(1)(2)(4)(5)20
8(a)(1)(3)(4)(5)960.5
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)200.1
Recapitulation
8(a)(1)18,304100.0
8(a)(2)4442.4
8(a)(3)8,04744.0
8(a)(4)6973.8
8(a)(5)8,91148.7
B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)
Subsections of Sec. 8(b): Total cases6,349100.0
8(b)(1)4,78475.4
8(b)(2)560.9
8(b)(3)3475.5
8(b)(4)4647.3
8(b)(5)10
8(b)(6)20
8(b)(7)711.1
8(b)(1)(2)5088.0
8(b)(1)(3)831.3
8(b)(1)(5)10
8(b)(2)(3)20
8(b)(3)(6)10
8(b)(1)(2)(3)250.4
8(b)(1)(2)(5)20
8(b)(1)(3)(5)10
8(b)(1)(2)(3)(5)10
Recapitulation
8(b)(1)5,40585.1
8(b)(2)5949.4
8(b)(3)4607.2
8(b)(4)4937.8
8(b)(5)60.1
8(b)(6)30
8(b)(7)741.2
B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)
Total cases 8(b)(4)464100.0
8(b)(4)(A)235.0
8(b)(4)(B)30265.1
8(b)(4)(C)81.7
8(b)(4)(D)10422.4
8(b)(4)(A)(B)224.7
8(b)(4)(B)(C)30.6
8(b)(4)(A)(B)(C)20.4
Recapitulation
8(b)(4)(A)4710.1
8(b)(4)(B)32970.9
8(b)(4)(C)132.8
8(b)(4)(D)10422.4
B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)
Total cases 8(b)(7)71100.0
8(b)(7)(A)1622.5
8(b)(7)(B)45.6
8(b)(7)(C)4867.6
8(b)(7)(A)(B)22.8
8(b)(7)(A)(C)11.4
Recapitulation
8(b)(7)(A)1926.8
8(b)(7)(B)68.5
8(b)(7)(C)4969.0
C. Charges filed under Sec. 8(e)
Total cases 8(e)41100.0
Against unions alone2663.4
Against employers alone819.5
Against both717.1
D. Charges filed Sec. 8(g)
Total cases 8(g)32100.0

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the
  2. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the various allegations is greater than the total number of cases
  3. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the various allegations is greater than the total number of cases.

0 of 72 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 107. Three printed columns: stub (unlabelled), \"Number of cases showing specific allegations\", \"Percent of total cases\". Crop boundaries: (1) The table clearly continues past the bottom of this page — the 8(b) subsection-combination rows and an 8(b) recapitulation block would follow after \"8(b)(7)\", and footnote 1 is itself cut off mid-sentence at the bottom edge (\"...Therefore, the total of the\"); it is transcribed only as far as printed on this image. (2) A panel heading parallel to \"B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)\" — presumably an \"A. Charges filed against employers under Sec. 8(a)\" line — would be expected in the blank band between the column headings and the first body row, but no such text is legible on this crop, so no row was created for it. \"Recapitulation\" and \"B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)\" are centred section lines spanning the full table width; their value cells are empty. The raised 1 on \"Recapitulation\" is recorded as the footnote marker ^1. Percent cells printed as a bare \"0\" (rows 8(a)(1)(2)(4), 8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4), 8(a)(1)(2)(4)(5), 8(b)(5), 8(b)(6)) are transcribed as \"0\" exactly as printed, not as \"0.0\". Nothing was computed or corrected: the 8(a) recapitulation line for 8(a)(1) (18,304 / 100.0) equals the 8(a) total as printed.

p. 108. This is a continuation page: no column headings are printed on the crop, so header_rows is empty. The grid has three columns — stub, a count column, and a percent column — as marked by the two vertical rules; the second and third column headings (number and percent of cases) appear only on the earlier page of the table. The table is cut off at the bottom: section "B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)" shows only "Total cases 8(b)(7)" and "8(b)(7)(A)" before the footnote line; the remaining 8(b)(7) rows continue on the following page. Centered section lines "Recapitulation^1", "B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)", "Recapitulation" and "B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)" are printed spanning the full table width with no values; their value cells are given as "". The first "Recapitulation" carries a raised 1 footnote marker; the second (inside B1) does not. Internal inconsistencies transcribed as printed, not corrected: the recapitulation line for 8(b)(4) gives 493 allegations while section B1 gives "Total cases 8(b)(4)" as 464; likewise 8(b)(7) is 74 in the recapitulation and 71 in B2. The B1 recapitulation percentages (10.1 + 70.9 + 2.8 + 22.4) sum above 100 because a case may appear under several subsections, per footnote 1. Several percent cells are printed as a bare "0" rather than "0.0"; they are transcribed as "0".

p. 109. This is a continuation page ("—Continued"): no column headings are printed on the image, so header_rows is empty. The grid has three columns (stub, a count column, a percent column) delimited by two vertical rules; the counts and percents are unlabelled here. "Recapitulation", "C. Charges filed under Sec. 8(e)" and "D. Charges filed Sec. 8(g)" are centered section lines spanning the width with no values. The first four rows continue a section begun on the previous page (charges under Sec. 8(b)(7)). "Recapitulation" carries a superscript 1 footnote marker, transcribed as Recapitulation^1. All cells are crisply printed and legible; no doubtful digits.

Source image

Source page 107 of NLRB FY2005 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2005, p. 107.
Source page 108 of NLRB FY2005 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2005, p. 108.
Source page 109 of NLRB FY2005 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2005, p. 109.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.