Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2004—Page 1 of 3

p. 201. Three printed columns (stub, "Number of cases showing specific allegations", "Percent of total cases") with a single heading level; the stub heading is blank. Section lines "A. Charges filed against employers under Sec. 8(a)", "Recapitulation^1" and "B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)" are printed centred across the full table width and are given as label-only rows. Footnote not transcribed: one footnote keyed to the raised 1 on "Recapitulation" begins below the rule at the foot of the page, but the crop cuts through its first line of type so only the tops of the letters survive and it cannot be read reliably; it is therefore omitted from `footnotes` rather than guessed. The table is captioned "Page 1 of 3" and the body stops after 8(b)(4); the remaining 8(b) rows continue on the following page, outside this crop. Percent values of 0 for 8(a)(1)(2)(4), 8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4) and 8(a)(1)(2)(4)(5) are printed as a bare "0" (no decimal), as transcribed. The sums of the component rows exceed the printed totals because a case may show more than one allegation; nothing was computed or corrected.

p. 202. Three printed columns: stub, "Number of cases showing specific allegations", "Percent of total cases". Both column headings are single-level; the stub has no printed heading. The page is the middle sheet of a three-page table ("Page 2 of 3"), so the body begins mid-list (first row is 8(b)(5), continuing from the previous page) and the final "Recapitulation^1" block is cut short by the page break: only its first line, 8(b)(4)(A) 37 / 6.2, is printed here before the footnote rule; the remaining recapitulation lines continue on the next page. "Recapitulation^1" and "B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)" are centered section lines spanning the full table width and carry no values. The raised 1 on both "Recapitulation" lines is the footnote marker. Possible inconsistency as printed (not altered): the recapitulation line for 8(b)(4) gives 612 cases, while the B1 section's "Total cases 8(b)(4)" gives 595, and the B1 detail lines (22+384+17+155+15+2 = 595) sum to 595 while their percents (3.7+64.5+2.9+26.1+2.5+0.3 = 100.0) are taken against 595. Transcribed exactly as printed. All digits were legible; no doubtful cells.

p. 203. The crop shows only a short fragment of the table: one heading level, then three data rows (8(b)(4)(B), (C), (D)), closed by a bottom rule. The stub column has no printed heading. Below the table's closing rule a centered section line reading "D3. Analysis of 8(b)(7)" is visible but sliced through horizontally by the bottom edge of the crop; it introduces a further section of the table whose own column headings and data rows are not on this image, so it was not transcribed as a row. The running head ("204 Appendix") and the caption ("Table 2.—Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2004—Page 3 of 3") were omitted as instructed. All six numeric cells are crisply printed and unambiguous; no footnote markers appear anywhere on the crop.