NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2003 › Special Litigation Involving NLRB; Outcome of Proceedings in Which Court Decisions Issued in Fiscal Year 2003

Special Litigation Involving NLRB; Outcome of Proceedings in Which Court Decisions Issued in Fiscal Year 2003

printed as Table 21 · source pages 196–197 · nlrb2003_p0196_t0

Stitched from pp. 196–197.

Type of LitigationNumber of Proceedings
Type of LitigationTotal – all courtsIn courts of appealsIn district courtsIn bankruptcy courtsIn state courts
Type of LitigationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt Determination
Type of LitigationNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board position
Totals—all types990330440220000
NLRB—initiated actions or interventions220110000110000
Motion to file Bd's late proof of claim110000000110000
To enforce subpoena or contempt of subpoena110110000000000
To lift stay in subpoena enforcement action000000000000000
To enjoin local ordinance as preempted000000000000000
Action by other parties770220440110000
To review:000000000000000
Prosecutorial discretion000000000000000
Nonfinal/representation order000000000000000
To restrain NLRB from:000000000000000
Enforcing Board subpoenas000000000000000
Proceeding in R case000000000000000
Proceeding in unfair labor practice case000000000000000
To compel NLRB to:330220000110000
Issue complaint220220000000000
Take action in R case000000000000000
Vacate election/Decertify Rep.110000000110000
To issue decision or take specific action000000000000000
Other440000440000000
Objection to Board's proof of claim000000000000000
Intervention to argue Collateral Estoppal of Prior Bd decision110000110000000
Suit alleging fraudulent and corrupt conduct by Bd aents220000220000000
Bivens action against Bd employees110000110000000
Suit for violation of constitutional rights000000000000000
Federal Tort Claims Act000000000000000
State claims preempted by §§ 8(b)(4) & 303000000000000000

Download this table (CSV)

0 of 60 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 196. Grid is 16 columns: stub plus five court groups (Total – all courts, In courts of appeals, In district courts, In bankruptcy courts, In state courts), each with Number decided / Upholding Board position / Contrary to Board position. In each group the "Number decided" cell is a tall box spanning the "Court Determination" level and the level below, so it is repeated in both header levels 3 and 4. Internal sums suggest the table continues beyond this crop: "Action by other parties" is 7 (total all courts) and 4 (district courts), but the itemized rows printed below it ("To review:" 0, "To restrain NLRB from:" 0, "To compel NLRB to:" 3, "To issue decision or take specific action" 0) sum to only 3, with 0 in every district-courts cell. The last printed row sits on the bottom rule of the crop; further detail rows (including the district-court items) appear to be on the following page. "Totals—all types" (9) and "NLRB—initiated actions or interventions" (2) are internally consistent as printed. Row labels use the printed punctuation: em dashes in "Totals—all types" and "NLRB—initiated actions or interventions"; a curly apostrophe in "Bd's"; the group heading reads "Total – all courts" with an en dash. Leader dots after labels were dropped; the trailing period in "Vacate election/Decertify Rep." is part of the abbreviation and was kept. No footnote markers and no footnotes are printed under the table. All cells are legible; no doubtful digits.

p. 197. Continuation page of Table 21; the column headings are reprinted in full on this crop, so they are transcribed. 16 columns: stub plus five court groups of three columns each (Number decided / Upholding Board position / Contrary to Board position). In each group the "Number decided" column is a tall heading box with no sub-head above it, so it is repeated in the two lowest heading levels; "Court Determination" spans only the second and third columns of each group. The dash in "Total – all courts" is printed as an en dash. Row labels are transcribed exactly as printed, including two apparent misprints in the original: "Collateral Estoppal" (for "Estoppel") and "by Bd aents" (for "by Bd agents"). "Board's" uses a typographic apostrophe in the source. The crop begins mid-table with the "Other" line, whose indented detail lines follow; the seven detail values in the first column (0, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0) do sum to the printed "Other" total of 4. No footnotes are printed beneath the table on this page.

Source image

Source page 196 of NLRB FY2003 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2003, p. 196.
Source page 197 of NLRB FY2003 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2003, p. 197.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.