Remedial Actions Taken in Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 2002

p. 96. 14 columns: stub, "Total all", then six Employer columns and six Union columns under "Remedial action taken by–". Dash cells: many cells are printed with a short dash rule ("--") marking "not applicable"; per the transcription rule for dash rules these are given as "". They occur in the whole body of the "A. By number of cases involved" row (all 13 value columns), in the six Union columns of the rows "Recognition or other assistance withdrawn", "Employer-dominated union disestablished", "Employees offered reinstatement" and "Employees placed on preferential hiring list", and in the six Employer columns of "Hiring hall rights restored", "Objections to employment withdrawn", "Picketing ended" and "Work stoppage ended". Elsewhere a printed 0 is transcribed as 0. Markers: the caption carries a raised 1 (caption not transcribed); in the "A. By number of cases involved" row a raised 2 is printed immediately before the figure, transcribed as "11,487^2". Crop: no footnote text is printed on this image — the texts for markers 1 and 2 are not visible — and the table is cut off below "Other remedies" (the body continues, presumably with a section B, on the following page). No column rule separates the Union "Recommen-dation of administrative law judge" heading from its neighbours differently from the Employer side; the Union heading is hyphenated across lines as "Recommen-/dation" and is joined here. All arithmetic checks pass: in every data row the five "Pursuant to–" columns sum to that party's "Total", and Employer Total + Union Total equals "Total all"; no misprints detected.

p. 97. 14 columns: stub, "Total all", then six Employer columns and six Union columns under "Remedial action taken by–". The Union side's third "Pursuant to–" heading is printed as "Recommen -dation of administra- tive law judge" (the Employer side as "Recommen- dation of administra- tive law judge"); both are joined here as "Recommendation of administrative law judge". Many cells are printed as a short double dash "--" (meaning not applicable: Employer columns on union-only rows and Union columns on employer-only rows). Following the rule that a dash-filled cell is empty, these are transcribed as "". The affected cells are: Union columns (cols 8-13) of "Employees offered reinstatement, total", "Accepted", "Declined", and "Employees placed on preferential hiring list"; and Employer columns (cols 2-7) of "Hiring hall rights restored" and "Objections to employment withdrawn". Printed zeros ("0") are kept as 0 and are distinct from these dashes. This crop continues the table from the previous page: it begins with section "B. By number of employees affected:" (section A is not on this image), and the body ends after "From either employer or union" under "Employees reimbursed for fees, dues, and fines:" — the table likely continues onto the following page, and no footnote text is printed on this crop even though the caption carries marker 1. All row and panel totals as printed are internally consistent (e.g. 1179+83+48+181+198 = 1689; 15,722+203 = 15,925; 907+1104 = 2011); no suspected misprints. Note the inconsistent typesetting of thousands separators as printed: "15,925", "15,722" and "10,361" carry commas while "1449", "1179", "2559", "1104", "1021" and "2011" do not; transcribed as printed.

p. 98. Crop is a continuation page ("—Continued"): the first body row ("From both employer and union") belongs to a section begun on the previous page, and no section header for it is printed here. A footnote line (marker 1, keyed to the caption "Fiscal Year 2002^1") begins at the very bottom edge of the crop but is sliced horizontally — only the top sliver of the letters is visible — so its text cannot be read reliably and it is omitted rather than guessed. It appears to begin "1 See Glossary ... for definitions. Data in this table are based on ... that were closed during Fiscal Year 2002 ...". Further footnotes, if any, fall below the crop. Row label "Reimbursement of fees, dues,and fines" is printed with no space after the comma in "dues,and"; transcribed as printed. The Union panel's third sub-column heading is typeset "Recommen -dation of administra- tive law judge" (hyphen placement differs from the Employer side's "Recommen- dation of administra- tive law judge"); both joined to "Recommendation of administrative law judge". All four body rows are internally consistent: each panel's five "Pursuant to" columns sum to that panel's Total, and Employer Total + Union Total equals Total all. No suspected misprints.