NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2002 › Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 2002

Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 2002

printed as Table 3C · source page 95 · nlrb2002_p0095_t0

Types of formal actions takenCases in which formal actions takenFormal actions taken by type of case
Types of formal actions takenCases in which formal actions takenACUC
Hearings completed74162
Decisions issued after hearing90669
By Regional Directors85669
By Board505
Transferred by Regional Directors for initial decision000
Review of Regional Directors' decisions:
Requests for review received44042
Withdrawn before request ruled upon302
Board action on requests ruled upon, total28026
Granted505
Denied20018
Remanded303
Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review000
Board decision after review, total505
Regional Directors' decisions:
Affirmed202
Modified000
Reversed303

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 See Glossary of terms for definitions.

0 of 29 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 95. Four printed columns: stub, \"Cases in which formal actions taken\", and the two-column spanner \"Formal actions taken by type of case\" (marker 2) over AC and UC. The table's right-hand vertical rule is visible at the edge of the crop, so no further case-type column appears to be printed. Arithmetic caution: for most rows the AC and UC entries do not sum to the figure in \"Cases in which formal actions taken\" (e.g. Hearings completed 74 vs 1+62=63; Decisions issued after hearing 90 vs 6+69=75; By Regional Directors 85 vs 6+69=75; Requests for review received 44 vs 0+42=42; Board action on requests ruled upon, total 28 vs 0+26=26; Denied 20 vs 0+18=18; Withdrawn before request ruled upon 3 vs 0+2=2). Rows By Board, Remanded, Board decision after review total, Affirmed, Modified and Reversed do balance. Values are transcribed exactly as printed; the gap may be explained by footnote 2, whose text falls below this crop. The footnote area is cut off at the bottom of the crop: footnote 1 is readable (its descenders are clipped), and footnote 2, referenced in the spanner heading, is not visible on this image. Row labels \"Review of Regional Directors' decisions:\" and \"Regional Directors' decisions:\" are printed with a typographic right single quotation mark; a plain apostrophe is used here. Indentation levels of the stub labels are not preserved in the grid.

Source image

Source page 95 of NLRB FY2002 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2002, p. 95.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.