NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2002 › Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 2002
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | Formal actions taken by type of case | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | AC | UC |
| Hearings completed | 74 | 1 | 62 |
| Decisions issued after hearing | 90 | 6 | 69 |
| By Regional Directors | 85 | 6 | 69 |
| By Board | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Transferred by Regional Directors for initial decision | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Review of Regional Directors' decisions: | |||
| Requests for review received | 44 | 0 | 42 |
| Withdrawn before request ruled upon | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Board action on requests ruled upon, total | 28 | 0 | 26 |
| Granted | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Denied | 20 | 0 | 18 |
| Remanded | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Board decision after review, total | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Regional Directors' decisions: | |||
| Affirmed | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Modified | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reversed | 3 | 0 | 3 |
0 of 29 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 95. Four printed columns: stub, \"Cases in which formal actions taken\", and the two-column spanner \"Formal actions taken by type of case\" (marker 2) over AC and UC. The table's right-hand vertical rule is visible at the edge of the crop, so no further case-type column appears to be printed. Arithmetic caution: for most rows the AC and UC entries do not sum to the figure in \"Cases in which formal actions taken\" (e.g. Hearings completed 74 vs 1+62=63; Decisions issued after hearing 90 vs 6+69=75; By Regional Directors 85 vs 6+69=75; Requests for review received 44 vs 0+42=42; Board action on requests ruled upon, total 28 vs 0+26=26; Denied 20 vs 0+18=18; Withdrawn before request ruled upon 3 vs 0+2=2). Rows By Board, Remanded, Board decision after review total, Affirmed, Modified and Reversed do balance. Values are transcribed exactly as printed; the gap may be explained by footnote 2, whose text falls below this crop. The footnote area is cut off at the bottom of the crop: footnote 1 is readable (its descenders are clipped), and footnote 2, referenced in the spanner heading, is not visible on this image. Row labels \"Review of Regional Directors' decisions:\" and \"Regional Directors' decisions:\" are printed with a typographic right single quotation mark; a plain apostrophe is used here. Indentation levels of the stub labels are not preserved in the grid.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.