NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2001 › Special Litigation Involving NLRB; Outcome of Proceedings in Which Court Decisions Issued in Fiscal Year 2001
Stitched from pp. 197–198.
| Type of Litigation | Number of Proceedings | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Litigation | Total – all courts | In courts of appeals | In district courts | In bankruptcy courts | In state courts | ||||||||||
| Type of Litigation | Number decided | Court Determination | Number decided | Court Determination | Number decided | Court Determination | Number decided | Court Determination | Number decided | Court Determination | |||||
| Type of Litigation | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position |
| Totals—all types | 17 | 17 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NLRB—initiated actions or interventions | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| For protective order or to quash district court subpoena | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To enforce subpoena or contempt of subpoena | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To enjoin local ordinance as preempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Action by other parties | 16 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To review: | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Prosecutorial discretion | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nonfinal/representation order | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To restrain NLRB from: | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Enforcing Board subpoenas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Proceeding in R case | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Proceeding in unfair labor practice case | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To compel NLRB to: | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Issue complaint | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Take action in R case | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Comply with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (in camera inspection) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joinder | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To issue decision or take specific action | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Objection to Board's proof of claim | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Intervention in § 301 suit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EAJA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denying attorney's fees in FOIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Suit for violation of constitutional rights | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federal Tort Claims Act | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| State claims preempted by Sec. 8(b)(4) and Sec. 303 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0 of 82 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 197. 16 columns: the stub plus five court groups of three columns each (Number decided / Upholding Board position / Contrary to Board position). In the printed heading the column stubs are broken by end-of-line hyphens ("Num-ber decid-ed", "Uphold -ing Board posi-tion", "Con-trary to Board posi-tion"); these were joined. The crop ends at the bottom of the page with the row "To issue decision or take specific action", and the table almost certainly continues on the following page: under "Action by other parties" the printed figures are 16 total / 5 courts of appeals / 11 district courts, but the subcategory rows shown here ("To review:" 5/3/2, "To restrain NLRB from:" 3/1/2, "To compel NLRB to:" 4/1/3) sum to only 12/5/7. No section rule or footnote block follows the last row. Footnote marker 1 is printed as a raised digit after "(FOIA)" in the row "Comply with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (in camera inspection)", but the footnote text itself is not printed within this crop, so `footnotes` is empty. Several labels end with a colon that is part of the printed label ("To review:", "To restrain NLRB from:", "To compel NLRB to:"); these were kept and the trailing leader dots dropped. All values are single digits and legible; no doubtful cells.
p. 198. This crop is the continuation page of Table 21 (caption carries "—Continued"), so the body begins mid-table: the first row, "Other", is a group line that carries totals, and the seven rows beneath it are its indented sub-items (indentation is not represented in the grid). Layout: 16 columns = stub + five court groups of three columns each. In each group the "Number decided" column has no separate third-level heading and its cell runs from the group heading down to the body, so I repeated "Number decided" in both the third and fourth heading levels; "Court Determination" spans the group's remaining two columns. Hyphenated stacked headings were rejoined ("Num-ber decid-ed" → "Number decided", "Uphold-ing Board posi-tion" → "Upholding Board position", "Con-trary to Board posi-tion" → "Contrary to Board position"). The "Total – all courts" heading is printed with a spaced dash, transcribed as an en dash. Footnote 1 is printed under the table, but no superscript 1 is visible anywhere on this crop — its referent (presumably a FOIA row or heading) is most likely on the preceding page of the table. All 15 numeric columns are legible; no doubtful digits. Row "Other" (4 decided, 4 upholding in both the all-courts and district-courts groups) is internally consistent with its sub-rows (2 + 1 + 1 = 4).
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.