NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2001 › Special Litigation Involving NLRB; Outcome of Proceedings in Which Court Decisions Issued in Fiscal Year 2001

Special Litigation Involving NLRB; Outcome of Proceedings in Which Court Decisions Issued in Fiscal Year 2001

printed as Table 21 · source pages 197–198 · nlrb2001_p0197_t0

Stitched from pp. 197–198.

Type of LitigationNumber of Proceedings
Type of LitigationTotal – all courtsIn courts of appealsIn district courtsIn bankruptcy courtsIn state courts
Type of LitigationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt Determination
Type of LitigationNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board position
Totals—all types1717055012120000000
NLRB—initiated actions or interventions110000110000000
For protective order or to quash district court subpoena110000110000000
To enforce subpoena or contempt of subpoena000000000000000
To enjoin local ordinance as preempted000000000000000
Action by other parties1616055011110000000
To review:550330220000000
Prosecutorial discretion550330220000000
Nonfinal/representation order000000000000000
To restrain NLRB from:330110220000000
Enforcing Board subpoenas000000000000000
Proceeding in R case110110000000000
Proceeding in unfair labor practice case220000220000000
To compel NLRB to:440110330000000
Issue complaint220110110000000
Take action in R case000000000000000
Comply with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (in camera inspection)110000110000000
Joinder110000110000000
To issue decision or take specific action000000000000000
Other440000440000000
Objection to Board's proof of claim000000000000000
Intervention in § 301 suit220000220000000
EAJA000000000000000
Denying attorney's fees in FOIA000000000000000
Suit for violation of constitutional rights110000110000000
Federal Tort Claims Act000000000000000
State claims preempted by Sec. 8(b)(4) and Sec. 303110000110000000

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 FOIA cases are categorized as to court determination depending on whether NLRB substantially prevailed.

0 of 82 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 197. 16 columns: the stub plus five court groups of three columns each (Number decided / Upholding Board position / Contrary to Board position). In the printed heading the column stubs are broken by end-of-line hyphens ("Num-ber decid-ed", "Uphold -ing Board posi-tion", "Con-trary to Board posi-tion"); these were joined. The crop ends at the bottom of the page with the row "To issue decision or take specific action", and the table almost certainly continues on the following page: under "Action by other parties" the printed figures are 16 total / 5 courts of appeals / 11 district courts, but the subcategory rows shown here ("To review:" 5/3/2, "To restrain NLRB from:" 3/1/2, "To compel NLRB to:" 4/1/3) sum to only 12/5/7. No section rule or footnote block follows the last row. Footnote marker 1 is printed as a raised digit after "(FOIA)" in the row "Comply with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (in camera inspection)", but the footnote text itself is not printed within this crop, so `footnotes` is empty. Several labels end with a colon that is part of the printed label ("To review:", "To restrain NLRB from:", "To compel NLRB to:"); these were kept and the trailing leader dots dropped. All values are single digits and legible; no doubtful cells.

p. 198. This crop is the continuation page of Table 21 (caption carries "—Continued"), so the body begins mid-table: the first row, "Other", is a group line that carries totals, and the seven rows beneath it are its indented sub-items (indentation is not represented in the grid). Layout: 16 columns = stub + five court groups of three columns each. In each group the "Number decided" column has no separate third-level heading and its cell runs from the group heading down to the body, so I repeated "Number decided" in both the third and fourth heading levels; "Court Determination" spans the group's remaining two columns. Hyphenated stacked headings were rejoined ("Num-ber decid-ed" → "Number decided", "Uphold-ing Board posi-tion" → "Upholding Board position", "Con-trary to Board posi-tion" → "Contrary to Board position"). The "Total – all courts" heading is printed with a spaced dash, transcribed as an en dash. Footnote 1 is printed under the table, but no superscript 1 is visible anywhere on this crop — its referent (presumably a FOIA row or heading) is most likely on the preceding page of the table. All 15 numeric columns are legible; no doubtful digits. Row "Other" (4 decided, 4 upholding in both the all-courts and district-courts groups) is internally consistent with its sub-rows (2 + 1 + 1 = 4).

Source image

Source page 197 of NLRB FY2001 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2001, p. 197.
Source page 198 of NLRB FY2001 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2001, p. 198.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.