NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2001 › Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 2001
Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 2001
Stitched from pp. 154–155.
| Method and stage of disposition | All C cases | CA cases | CB cases | CC cases | CD cases | CE cases | CG cases | CP cases | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method and stage of disposition | Number | Percent of total closed | Percent of total method | Number | Percent of total closed | Number | Percent of total closed | Number | Percent of total closed | Number | Percent of total closed | Number | Percent of total closed | Number | Percent of total closed | Number | Percent of total closed |
| Total number of cases closed | 29,670 | 100.0 | 22,745 | 100.0 | 6,158 | 100.0 | 428 | 100.0 | 171 | 100.0 | 29 | 100.0 | 23 | 100.0 | 116 | 100.0 | |
| Agreement of the parties | 10,876 | 36.7 | 100.0 | 9,624 | 42.3 | 1,001 | 16.3 | 183 | 42.8 | 3 | 1.8 | 14 | 48.3 | 7 | 30.4 | 44 | 37.9 |
| Informal settlement | 10,820 | 36.5 | 99.5 | 9,572 | 42.1 | 997 | 16.2 | 183 | 42.8 | 3 | 1.8 | 14 | 48.3 | 7 | 30.4 | 44 | 37.9 |
| Before issuance of complaint | 8,108 | 27.3 | 74.5 | 7,036 | 30.9 | 859 | 13.9 | 158 | 36.9 | 2 | 1.2 | 11 | 37.9 | 6 | 26.1 | 36 | 31.0 |
| After issuance of complaint, before opening of hearing | 2,577 | 8.7 | 23.7 | 2,407 | 10.6 | 133 | 2.2 | 25 | 5.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 10.3 | 1 | 4.3 | 8 | 6.9 |
| After hearing opened, before issuance of administrative law judge's decision | 135 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 129 | 0.6 | 5 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Formal settlement | 56 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 52 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Before opening of hearing | 54 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 50 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Stipulated decision | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Consent decree | 52 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 48 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| After hearing opened | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Stipulated decision | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Consent decree | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Compliance with | 738 | 2.5 | 100.0 | 672 | 3.0 | 53 | 0.9 | 10 | 2.3 | 1 | 0.6 | 1 | 3.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.9 |
| Administrative law judge's decision | 4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Board decision | 430 | 1.4 | 58.3 | 388 | 1.7 | 37 | 0.6 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.6 | 1 | 3.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.9 |
| Adopting administrative law judge's decision (no exceptions filed) | 145 | 0.5 | 19.6 | 124 | 0.5 | 19 | 0.3 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Contested | 285 | 1.0 | 38.6 | 264 | 1.2 | 18 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.6 | 1 | 3.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.9 |
| Circuit court of appeals decree | 304 | 1.0 | 41.2 | 280 | 1.2 | 16 | 0.3 | 8 | 1.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Supreme Court action | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Withdrawal | 8,496 | 28.6 | 100.0 | 6,590 | 29.0 | 1,691 | 27.5 | 163 | 38.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 7 | 24.1 | 9 | 39.1 | 36 | 31.0 |
| Before issuance of complaint | 8,250 | 27.8 | 97.1 | 6,365 | 28.0 | 1,674 | 27.2 | 159 | 37.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 7 | 24.1 | 9 | 39.1 | 36 | 31.0 |
| After issuance of complaint, before opening of hearing | 136 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 121 | 0.5 | 11 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| After hearing opened, before administrative law judge's decision | 22 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 21 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| After administrative law judge's decision, before Board decision | 63 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 59 | 0.3 | 4 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| After Board or court decision | 25 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 24 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Dismissal | 9,185 | 31.0 | 100.0 | 5,661 | 24.9 | 3,410 | 55.4 | 60 | 14.0 | 5 | 2.9 | 7 | 24.1 | 7 | 30.4 | 35 | 30.2 |
| Before issuance of complaint | 8,958 | 30.2 | 97.5 | 5,466 | 24.0 | 3,382 | 54.9 | 58 | 13.6 | 4 | 2.3 | 6 | 20.7 | 7 | 30.4 | 35 | 30.2 |
| After issuance of complaint, before opening of hearing | 79 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 69 | 0.3 | 9 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| After hearing opened, before administrative law judge's decision | 23 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 22 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| By administrative law judge's decision | 7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| By Board decision | 109 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 88 | 0.4 | 19 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 3.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Adopting administrative law judge's decision (no exceptions filed) | 53 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 43 | 0.2 | 10 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Contested | 56 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 45 | 0.2 | 9 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 3.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| By circuit court of appeals decree | 8 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 8 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| By Supreme Court action | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 10(k) actions (see Table 7A for details of dispositions) | 162 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 162 | 94.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Otherwise (compliance with order of administrative law judge or Board not achieved—firm went out of business) | 213 | 0.7 | 198 | 0.9 | 3 | 0.0 | 12 | 2.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
- 1 See Table 8 for summary of disposition by stage. See Glossary of terms for definitions.
- 2 CD cases closed in this stage are processed as jurisdictional disputes under Sec. 10(k) of the Act. See Table 7A.
165 of 165 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
Reader’s notes
p. 154. Grid is 18 columns: stub plus "All C cases" (Number, Percent of total closed, Percent of total method) and seven two-column panels (CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG, CP), each Number and Percent of total closed. The crop ends after the "Withdrawal" row (a double rule is printed below it); the table continues on the following page, so no footnote texts are visible even though footnote markers are printed on the caption ("Fiscal Year 2001^1", caption excluded per instructions) and on the "CD cases^2" column heading. In "Total number of cases closed", the "Percent of total method" cell prints a double dash ("--", i.e. not applicable); transcribed as "" per the dash-cell rule. All internal sums check out as printed (component rows add to their subtotals, and the seven case-type Number columns add to the All C cases Number column in every row), so no suspected misprints. The only rounding artifact is in "Percent of total method" under "Board decision": 19.6 + 38.6 = 58.2 against the printed 58.3; transcribed as printed.
p. 155. This page continues Table 7 from the previous page, so the first five rows ("Before issuance of complaint" through "After Board or court decision") are the stage breakdown of a method heading (apparently "Withdrawal") that is printed on the earlier page and not on this crop; their "Percent of total method" values sum to 100.0, consistent with that reading. The column headings are reprinted in full on this page, so they are given here. In the "All C cases / Percent of total method" column, the last two rows ("10(k) actions ..." and "Otherwise (compliance ...)") print a short dash rule "--" rather than a value; these are transcribed as empty cells per the dash-rule convention. Row indentation shows hierarchy that the flat grid cannot carry: "Dismissal" is a method total row (its "Percent of total method" is 100.0) and the seven rows that follow it are its stages; "Adopting administrative law judge's decision (no exceptions filed)" and "Contested" are sub-stages of "By Board decision" (53 + 56 = 109). All visible column sums check out (e.g., All C cases Dismissal: 8,958 + 79 + 23 + 7 + 109 + 8 + 1 = 9,185; CA cases: 5,466 + 69 + 22 + 7 + 88 + 8 + 1 = 5,661), so no misprints are suspected. No cells were illegible.
Source image
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.