NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2001 › Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2001

Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 2001

printed as Table 2 · source pages 136–137 · nlrb2001_p0136_t0

Stitched from pp. 136–137.

Number of cases showing specific allegationsPercent of total cases
A. Charges filed against employers under Sec. 8(a)
Subsections of Sec. 8(a): Total cases21,512100.0
8(a)(1)3,46516.1
8(a)(1)(2)1600.7
8(a)(1)(3)7,48934.8
8(a)(1)(4)1410.7
8(a)(1)(5)7,58335.3
8(a)(1)(2)(3)1120.5
8(a)(1)(2)(4)10
8(a)(1)(2)(5)840.4
8(a)(1)(3)(4)4552.1
8(a)(1)(3)(5)1,8258.5
8(a)(1)(4)(5)170.1
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)40
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5)560.3
8(a)(1)(2)(4)(5)20
8(a)(1)(3)(4)(5)1060.5
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)120.1
Recapitulation
8(a)(1)21,512100.0
8(a)(2)4312.0
8(a)(3)10,05946.8
8(a)(4)7383.4
8(a)(5)9,68545.0
B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)
Subsections of Sec. 8(b): Total cases6,552100.0
8(b)(1)4,94175.4
8(b)(2)691.1
8(b)(3)3275.0
8(b)(4)6149.4
8(b)(5)10
8(b)(6)50.1
8(b)(7)951.4
8(b)(1)(2)3996.1
8(b)(1)(3)761.2
8(b)(1)(5)20
8(b)(2)(3)30
8(b)(3)(6)10
8(b)(1)(2)(3)140.2
8(b)(1)(2)(6)20
8(b)(1)(3)(5)20
8(b)(1)(2)(3)(5)10
Recapitulation
8(b)(1)5,43783.0
8(b)(2)4887.4
8(b)(3)4246.5
8(b)(4)65410.0
8(b)(5)60.1
8(b)(6)80.1
8(b)(7)1001.5
B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)
Total cases 8(b)(4)614100.0
8(b)(4)(A)264.2
8(b)(4)(B)36559.4
8(b)(4)(C)162.6
8(b)(4)(D)16727.2
8(b)(4)(A)(B)315.0
8(b)(4)(A)(C)10.2
8(b)(4)(B)(C)81.3
Recapitulation
8(b)(4)(A)589.4
8(b)(4)(B)40465.8
8(b)(4)(C)254.1
8(b)(4)(D)16727.2
B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)
Total cases 8(b)(7)95100.0
8(b)(7)(A)1818.9
8(b)(7)(B)99.5
8(b)(7)(C)6366.3
8(b)(7)(A)(C)33.2
8(b)(7)(B)(C)22.1
Recapitulation
8(b)(7)(A)2122.1
8(b)(7)(B)1111.6
8(b)(7)(C)6871.6
C. Charges filed under Sec. 8(e)
Total cases 8(e)27100.0
Against unions alone2281.5
Against employers alone311.1
Against both27.4
D. Charges filed Sec. 8(g)
Total cases 8(g)35100.0

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of

0 of 72 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 136. The crop ends at the bottom rule immediately under the last transcribed row, 8(b)(1)(2)(3)(5); the table almost certainly continues onto the following page (further 8(b) combination rows and a Recapitulation block for Sec. 8(b) would be expected), so this is a partial table. No footnote text is printed within the crop, even though "Recapitulation" in panel A carries a raised footnote marker 1; that footnote presumably appears under the continuation of the table. Three section lines ("A. Charges filed against employers under Sec. 8(a)", "Recapitulation^1", "B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)") are printed centered across the full width with no values, and are transcribed as label-only rows. The stub column has no printed heading. Zeros in the percent column are printed as a bare "0" (not "0.0") and are transcribed as printed. All numbers were legible; no doubtful cells.

p. 137. This is a continuation page (caption reads "—Continued"), so no column headings are printed; header_rows is therefore empty. The grid has three columns: stub, a number column, and a percent column (the percent column carries no printed "%" signs). The centred lines "Recapitulation^1", "B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)", "B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)", "C. Charges filed under Sec. 8(e)" and "D. Charges filed Sec. 8(g)" are section headings inside the body spanning the full width; they are transcribed as label-only rows with empty value cells. "Recapitulation" appears three times (once after the 8(b) list, once within B1, once within B2); each carries a raised 1 footnote marker. The crop is cut off at the bottom: footnote 1 breaks mid-sentence after "Therefore, the total of" and the rest of the footnote (and any further footnotes, plus any remaining rows of section D) is not on this image. The row "Total cases 8(g)" is the last fully printed row and its bottom rule is partly clipped. Printed inconsistency, transcribed as printed: in the first Recapitulation block 8(b)(4) is 654, but section B1 gives "Total cases 8(b)(4)" as 614; likewise 8(b)(7) is 100 in the Recapitulation versus 95 in B2. Both appear as shown in the source and have not been altered. Within B1 and B2 the recapitulation subtotals do reconcile with the detail lines (e.g. 26+31+1 = 58).

Source image

Source page 136 of NLRB FY2001 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2001, p. 136.
Source page 137 of NLRB FY2001 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2001, p. 137.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.