NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY2000 › Special Litigation Involving NLRB; Outcome of Proceedings in which Court Decisions issued in Fiscal Year 2000

Special Litigation Involving NLRB; Outcome of Proceedings in which Court Decisions issued in Fiscal Year 2000

printed as Table 21 · source pages 189–190 · nlrb2000_p0189_t0

Stitched from pp. 189–190.

Type of LitigationNumber of Proceedings
Type of LitigationTotal – all courtsIn courts of appealsIn district courtsIn bankruptcy courtsIn state courts
Type of LitigationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt DeterminationNumber decidedCourt Determination
Type of LitigationNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board positionNumber decidedUpholding Board positionContrary to Board position
Totals -- all types1284541642101000
NLRB-initiated actions or interventions101101000000000
To quash district court subpoena000000000000000
To enforce subpoena or contempt of subpoena000000000000000
To enjoin local ordinance as preempted101101000000000
To sanction failure to respond to discovery000000000000000
Action by other parties1183440642101000
To review:321220101000000
Prosecutorial discretion321220101000000
Nonfinal/representation order000000000000000
To restrain NLRB from:422110211101000
Enforcing Board subpoenas000000000000000
Proceeding in R case220110110000000
Proceeding in unfair labor practice case202000101101000
To compel NLRB to:110110000000000
Issue complaint000000000000000
Take action in R case000000000000000
Comply with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)000000000000000
To issue decision or take specific action110110000000000
Other330000330000000
Objection to Board's proof of claim000000000000000
Intervention in § 301 suit110000110000000
EAJA000000000000000
Denying attorney's fees in FOIA000000000000000
Denying stay in FOIA case000000000000000
Suit for violation of constitutional rights110000110000000
Federal Tort Claims Act110000110000000

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 FOIA cases are categorized as to court determination depending on whether NLRB substantially prevailed.

0 of 89 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 189. Grid is 16 columns: the stub plus five court groups ("Total – all courts", "In courts of appeals", "In district courts", "In bankruptcy courts", "In state courts"), each with three columns ("Number decided", "Upholding Board position", "Contrary to Board position"). Four heading levels; "Number of Proceedings" spans all 15 data columns, and each group's "Number decided" is a tall heading spanning levels 3 and 4. The crop appears to cut the table off at the bottom: the subcategories printed under "Action by other parties" ("To review:" 3/2/1, "To restrain NLRB from:" 4/2/2, "To compel NLRB to:" 1/1/0) sum to 8/5/3 in the "Total – all courts" group, not the printed 11/8/3, so further body rows almost certainly continue below the visible edge. Within the visible rows the other totals do reconcile ("Totals -- all types" = NLRB-initiated + Action by other parties, and each detail block sums to its heading row). The row label "Comply with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)" carries a raised 1 footnote marker, but no footnote text is printed within the crop, so `footnotes` is empty. "Totals -- all types" is transcribed with the double hyphen as printed; "Total – all courts" uses the printed en dash. Hyphenated heading fragments were rejoined ("Num- ber decid- ed" → "Number decided", "Uphold -ing" → "Upholding", "Con- trary" → "Contrary", "posi- tion" → "position"). All cells are legible; no doubtful digits.

p. 190. 16 columns: stub plus 5 court groups of 3 columns each (Number decided / Upholding Board position / Contrary to Board position). "Number decided" is a tall cell that spans the "Court Determination" level, so it is repeated in both of the lower heading levels. The group heading reads "Total – all courts" with a dash between the words. This is a continuation page ("—Continued" in the caption, omitted as instructed); the rows are the indented breakdown under the "Other" line, and the categories above "Other" are on the preceding page. Footnote 1 is printed under the table but no superscript "1" marker is visible anywhere on this crop — the referenced FOIA item(s) are presumably marked on the earlier page, or the marker did not reproduce in the scan. The two FOIA rows here ("Denying attorney's fees in FOIA", "Denying stay in FOIA case") carry no visible marker. The bottom rule of the table runs very close to / slightly overlaps the footnote text, but the "Federal Tort Claims Act" row and all 15 of its values are fully legible; no body row appears cut off. "Intervention in § 301 suit" is printed with an extra space after the section symbol. All values on the page are single digits (0, 1 or 3) and are clearly legible; the "Other" line (3) equals the sum of its three nonzero sub-items, so the page is internally consistent.

Source image

Source page 189 of NLRB FY2000 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2000, p. 189.
Source page 190 of NLRB FY2000 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY2000, p. 190.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.