Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Jurisdictional Dispute Cases Closed Prior to Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings, Fiscal Year 2000

p. 152. Three printed columns with a single heading level. The stub holds a one-level indent hierarchy: the four method rows (Agreement of the parties-informal settlement; Compliance with Board decision and determination of dispute; Withdrawal; Dismissal) sit at the first indent level and their stage rows are indented under them; indentation is not represented in the grid. Several stage labels wrap onto two printed lines ("After opening of 10(k) hearing, before issuance of Board decision and determination of / dispute") and have been joined into one row, with the values printed on the second line kept with that row. Three stage labels repeat verbatim under different methods (Before 10(k) notice; After 10(k) notice, before opening of 10(k) hearing; After opening of 10(k) hearing, before issuance of Board decision and determination of dispute); the repeats are distinct rows, not duplicates. All arithmetic as printed is internally consistent: 45+3+61+21 = 130 and 34.6+2.3+46.9+16.2 = 100.0; the sub-stage counts also sum to each method total (40+3+2 = 45; 53+4+4+0 = 61; 19+0+1+1 = 21). No cells are illegible or doubtful, and nothing appears cut off by the crop — the footnote line is fully visible below the last row. The caption carries a raised 1 footnote marker, recorded with the footnote rather than in the grid.