Remedial Actions Taken in Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1998

p. 147. The table is cut off by the crop at the bottom: section B begins here but only "Employees offered reinstatement, total" and its indented sub-row "Accepted" are printed on this image; the rest of section B continues on the following page. No footnote text is printed below the table on this crop (the caption carries a superscript 1 marker, but the caption itself is excluded). Dash rules ("----", "-------") printed in place of inapplicable values are transcribed as empty cells, per instructions. In the "A By number of cases involved" row all twelve columns to the right of "Total all" hold such dash rules. Heading wording differs between the two halves as printed: the Employer half reads "Pursuant–" while the Union half reads "Pursuant to–". Transcribed as printed; the Employer form may be a typesetting omission of "to". The "Recommen- dation of administrat- ive law judge" heading was joined and de-hyphenated to "Recommendation of administrative law judge". Row labels joined from two printed lines: "Recognition or other assistance withdrawn", "Employer-dominated union Disestablished" (the second line "Disestablished" is capitalised as printed), "Employees offered reinstatement", "Employees placed on preferential hiring list", "Objections to employment withdrawn", "Reimbursement of fees, dues, and fines", "Other conditions of employment improved", "B By number of employees affected", "Employees offered reinstatement, total". Scan quality: the page has stray specks (e.g. a dot in the Employer/Court column of the "Employees offered reinstatement, total" row, left of "180", and marks near the Union headings); these were read as artifacts, not characters. Every row's printed components sum to its printed subtotals and totals, which corroborates the column assignments.

p. 148. 14 columns: stub, "Total all", then six Employer columns and six Union columns. Five heading levels; "Action taken", "Total all", the two "Total" columns and the two "Recommendation of administrative law judge" columns are tall headings repeated down the levels they span. This crop continues Table 4 from the preceding page: the opening row "Declined" belongs to the section (B, by number of employees involved) that began there, and its section line is not on this image. Dash rules ("----") are transcribed as "" throughout. Vertical displacement of the Union columns in the printing. In the Union "Formal settlement / Recommendation of ALJ / Board / Court" columns several values are printed one text-line above the row they belong to. Evidence from the printed totals: (a) the 1, 0, 396, 9 sitting on the "Employees receiving backpay" line complete the next row, since 102 + 1 + 0 + 396 + 9 = 508, that row's printed Union total; (b) the 21,783, 0, 73,538, 507,918 sitting on the "From either employer or union" (2,366) line match the "C By amounts of monetary recovery, total" Union row, since 404,528 + 21,783 + 0 + 73,538 + 507,918 = 1,007,767, while that row's own Formal/ALJ/Board/Court cells are printed as dash rules; (c) the 8,935 on the "From both employer and union" (132) line equals the Reimbursement row's Union Board figure. Everything is transcribed strictly in the position where it is printed, as instructed. Suspected misprints, transcribed as printed: "13,683458" (Backpay row, Employer / Order of – Board) is missing its second comma — the employer components 43,937,744 + 1,759,823 + 184,882 + 13,683,458 + 29,378,103 give exactly the printed Employer Total 88,944,010, so 13,683,458 is intended. "64,6032" (Backpay row, Union / Order of – Board) carries a trailing extra digit — 316,519 + 21,783 + 0 + 64,603 + 507,918 = 910,823, the printed Union total. "14,308" (Board) and "642,969" (Court) in the "C By amounts of monetary recovery, total" row appear to have lost leading digits: the two component rows give 13,683,458 + 634,642 = 14,318,100 and 29,378,103 + 1,264,866 = 30,642,969. In the Reimbursement row the employer components sum to 2,191,839 against a printed Employer Total of 2,181,839, a 10,000 discrepancy left as printed. The stub label of row 11 is printed "C By amounts of monetary re- covery, total"; a period after the section letter C, if present, is not legible. Isolated specks and stray comma-shaped marks appear in the scan (below the "Total all" heading, beside "Pursuant–" and "Pursuant to–", below "Total" in the Employer group, in the left margin by "Hiring hall rights restored", above the Board cell of row 11, and in the Union ALJ column of the "From both employer and union" (132) row). All are treated as scan artifacts, not footnote markers or digits. "requirments" at the end of footnote 1 is as printed (apparent misprint of "requirements"); terminal periods in both footnotes are faint to invisible in this scan.