NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1997 › NLRB Activity Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, Fiscal Year 1997
NLRB Activity Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, Fiscal Year 1997
| I. Applications for fees and expenses filed with the NLRB under 5 U.S.C. § 504: | |
|---|---|
| A. Number of applications filed | 3 |
| B. Decisions in EAJA cases ruled on (includes ALJ awards adopted by the Board and settlements): | |
| Granting fees | 2 |
| Denying fees | 0 |
| C. Amount of fees and expenses in cases listed in B, above: | |
| Claimed | $30,185.06 |
| Recovered | $14,345.09 |
| II. Petitions for review of Board Orders denying fees under 5 U.S.C. § 504: | |
| A. Awards granting fees (includes settlements) | 2 |
| B. Awards denying fees | 1 |
| C. Amount of fees and expenses recovered pursuant to court award or settlement (includes fees recovered in cases in which court finds merit to claim but remands to Board for determination of fee amount) | $48,585.35 |
| III. Applications for fees and expenses before the circuit courts of appeals under 5 U.S.C. § 2412 | |
| A. Awards granting fees (includes settlements) | 1 |
| B. Awards denying fees | 2 |
| C. Amount of fees and expenses recovered | $9,000.00 |
| IV. Applications for fees and expenses before the district courts under 5 U.S.C. § 2412: | |
| A. Awards granting fees (includes settlements) | 1 |
| B. Awards denying fees | 0 |
| C. Amount of fees and expenses recovered | $17,000.00 |
0 of 7 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
Reader’s notes
p. 174. The table is printed with no column headings at all: only the caption, a stub of item labels, and a single unlabeled column of values at the right margin, so header_rows is empty. Section lines (I, II, III, IV, and I.B and I.C) carry a label and no value; their value cell is "". Indentation of the original (roman-numeral lines flush left, lettered items indented, "Granting fees"/"Denying fees"/"Claimed"/"Recovered" indented further) is not representable in the grid and has been dropped; wording, numbering and capitalisation are as printed. Row "II.C" wraps onto two printed lines and has been joined into one label. Scan quality: the terminal punctuation after "in cases listed in B, above" (row I.C) and after "5 U.S.C. § 504" (row II) prints as a faint raised dot rather than a clean colon; I read both as colons, consistent with the other section lines. Row III appears to end without a terminal colon, unlike rows I, II and IV — transcribed as printed. Spacing around the section symbol (§) is inconsistent and degraded in the scan; rendered uniformly as "§ 504" / "§ 2412". No footnotes are printed below the rule.
Source image
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.