NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1996 › Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1996; and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936 Through 1996

Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1996; and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936 Through 1996

printed as Table 19 · source page 168 · nlrb1996_p0168_t0

Fiscal Year 1996July 5, 1935-Sept. 30, 1996
Number of proceedingsPercentagesJuly 5, 1935-Sept. 30, 1996
TotalVs. employers onlyVs. unions onlyVs. both employers and unionsBoard dismissalVs. employers onlyVs. unions onlyVs. both employers and unionsBoard dismissalNumberPercent
Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals1851671803
On petitions for review and/or enforcement1471331403100.0100.00.0100.010,926100.0
Board orders affirmed in full9784130363.292.90.0100.07,19365.8
Board orders affirmed with modification191810013.57.10.00.01,47313.5
Remanded to Board660004.50.00.00.05445.0
Board orders partially affirmed and partially remanded770005.30.00.00.02282.1
Board orders set aside181800013.50.00.00.01,48813.6
On petitions for contempt383440100.0100.0
Compliance after filing of petition, before court order12120035.30.0
Court orders holding respondent in contempt16142041.150.0
Court orders denying petition541011.825.0
Court orders directing compliance without contempt adjudication541011.825.0
Contempt petitions withdrawn without compliance00000.00.0
Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court33000100.0256100.0
Board orders affirmed in full33000100.015560.6
Board orders affirmed with modification00000187.0
Board orders set aside000004517.6
Remanded to Board00000197.4
Remanded to court of appeals00000166.2
Board's request for remand or modification of enforcement order denied0000010.4
Contempt cases remanded to court of appeals0000010.4
Contempt cases enforced0000010.4

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 "Proceedings" are comparable to "cases" reported in annual reports prior to fiscal 1964. This term more accurately describes the data inasmuch as a single "proceeding" often includes more than one "case." See Glossary of terms for definitions.
  2. 2 A proceeding in which the Board had entered an order dismissing the complaint and the charging party appealed such dismissal in the courts of appeals.
  3. 3 The Board appeared as "amicus curiae" in 0 case[s].

45 of 54 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 168. Twelve printed columns: a stub, five "Number of proceedings" columns and four "Percentages" columns under the spanner "Fiscal Year 1996", and Number/Percent under "July 5, 1935-Sept. 30, 1996". The stub heading is blank (only a stray printing speck sits there). Cells printed as a dash rule (long em-rule) are rendered as "". Suspected misprint: row "Court orders holding respondent in contempt", column "Percentages / Vs. employers only" reads 41.1 as printed, but 14 of 34 is 41.2; the companion percentages in that block (35.3, 11.8, 11.8) are consistent with a base of 34, so 41.1 looks like a typesetting/rounding error. Transcribed as printed. Minor rounding oddity, also transcribed as printed: row "Board orders affirmed in full" under the Supreme Court block shows cumulative 155 of 256 as 60.6 (155/256 = 60.5). In the row "Contempt cases remanded to court of appeals" the Total cell prints 0 followed by a small ink speck; read as 0. The scan is a lossy bilevel image, so isolated thin digits carry some risk, but all column sums and percentage checks reconcile except the two items named above.

Source image

Source page 168 of NLRB FY1996 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1996, p. 168.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.