Disposition by Stage of Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1995

p. 153. 17 columns: stub plus eight panels (All C, CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG, CP), each with Number and Percent of cases closed. Degraded decimal points: the scan drops or thins the decimal point in several percent cells, which print as a gap (e.g. "86 8", "0 6", "100 0", "1 0", "0 8", "0 1"). These are read as 86.8, 0.6, 100.0, 1.0, 0.8, 0.1 — the affected cells are All C Percent in rows "Before issuance of complaint" (86.8), "After administrative law judge's decision..." (0.1) and "After Board order adopting..." (0.8); CA Percent in "After hearing opened..." (0.6) and "After Board decision..." (1.0); CC Percent in "After Board decision..." (0.8); and CE Percent in the total row (100.0). All are confirmed by the panel arithmetic (each equals the row's Number divided by the panel total). Dash/blank cells: wherever a Number is 0 the matching Percent prints an em-dash rule (or is left blank in a few of the right-hand panels); all such cells are transcribed as "". Apparent misprint in the source, transcribed as printed: the stage rows do not sum to the printed totals in three panels. All C stages sum to 31,762 against a printed total of 31,775 (short by 13); CA stages sum to 23,850 against 23,862 (short by 12); CB stages sum to 7,003 against 7,004 (short by 1). The CC, CD, CE, CG and CP panels all sum exactly, every stage row sums correctly across the seven case-type panels into the All C column, the total row sums correctly across panels (23,862+7,004+522+241+28+27+91 = 31,775), and the All C shortfall (13) equals the CA shortfall plus the CB shortfall. The discrepancy is therefore in the printed figures, not in the reading of the digits. The caption carries footnote marker 1, which is answered by the single footnote below the table; per instructions the caption itself is omitted.