Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Jurisdictional Dispute Cases Closed Prior to Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings, Fiscal Year 1995

p. 152. Three printed columns; the footnote marker 1 appears on the caption (not transcribed) and is the only marker in the table. The last "After opening of 10(k) hearing, before issuance of Board decision and determination of dispute" row under Dismissal shows 0 cases and a dash rule in the percent column, transcribed as an empty cell. Several row labels wrap onto two lines with an end-of-line hyphen in "dis- pute"; these are joined. The indented rows under each heading (Agreement, Withdrawal, Dismissal) are subcategories of the heading row above them; the grid preserves their printed order but not the indentation. Possible misprint: the Dismissal subcategory percents (15.3 + 1.7 + 0 + 2.6 = 19.6) do not sum to the printed 20.0 for Dismissal, and 46 of 234 is about 19.7 percent; transcribed as printed. Minor scan specks: a faint mark follows 28.6 (Withdrawal, Before 10(k) notice, percent column) and a faint dot sits left of 46 in the Dismissal number-of-cases cell; both read as dirt rather than characters. The stub heading and both column headings are clearly legible.