NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1995 › Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1995
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | Formal actions taken by type of case | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | AC | UC |
| Hearings completed | 72 | 7 | 64 |
| Decisions issued after hearing | 100 | 5 | 91 |
| By Regional Directors | 83 | 5 | 78 |
| By Board | 17 | 0 | 13 |
| Transferred by Regional Directors for initial decision | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Review of Regional Directors' decisions: | |||
| Requests for review received | 29 | 0 | 26 |
| Withdrawn before request ruled upon | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Board action on requests ruled upon, total | 35 | 0 | 30 |
| Granted | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Denied | 22 | 0 | 19 |
| Remanded | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Board decision after review, total | 14 | 0 | 12 |
| Regional Directors' decisions: | |||
| Affirmed | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Modified | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Reversed | 12 | 0 | 10 |
0 of 33 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 138. Four printed columns: stub, "Cases in which formal actions taken", and the spanner "Formal actions taken by type of case" over AC and UC. Internal consistency: the AC and UC columns add to less than the "Cases in which formal actions taken" column in most rows (Hearings completed 7+64=71 vs 72; Decisions issued after hearing 5+91=96 vs 100; Transferred for initial decision 0+1=1 vs 3; Requests for review received 0+26=26 vs 29; Board action on requests ruled upon, total 0+30=30 vs 35; Board decision after review, total 0+12=12 vs 14; By Board 0+13=13 vs 17). Within each column the detail lines do add to their totals (83+17=100; 10+22+3=35; 1+1+12=14, and likewise for UC). Values are transcribed exactly as printed; nothing was adjusted. In the "By Board" row there is a small stray dash-like speck in the UC column just left of the figure 13; it is a scanning artifact, not a minus sign or a digit, and was not transcribed. The two section lines ("Review of Regional Directors' decisions:" and "Regional Directors' decisions:") end in a mark that reads as a colon in this scan; the first is slightly degraded and could be a period. The scan renders many lowercase "ti" pairs with a dotless i (e.g. "acuons" for "actions", "decisıon"); these were read as the normal words.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.