NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1995 › Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1995

Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1995

printed as Table 3C · source page 138 · nlrb1995_p0138_t0

Types of formal actions takenCases in which formal actions takenFormal actions taken by type of case
Types of formal actions takenCases in which formal actions takenACUC
Hearings completed72764
Decisions issued after hearing100591
By Regional Directors83578
By Board17013
Transferred by Regional Directors for initial decision301
Review of Regional Directors' decisions:
Requests for review received29026
Withdrawn before request ruled upon000
Board action on requests ruled upon, total35030
Granted10010
Denied22019
Remanded301
Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review101
Board decision after review, total14012
Regional Directors' decisions:
Affirmed101
Modified101
Reversed12010

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 See Glossary of terms for definitions.

0 of 33 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 138. Four printed columns: stub, "Cases in which formal actions taken", and the spanner "Formal actions taken by type of case" over AC and UC. Internal consistency: the AC and UC columns add to less than the "Cases in which formal actions taken" column in most rows (Hearings completed 7+64=71 vs 72; Decisions issued after hearing 5+91=96 vs 100; Transferred for initial decision 0+1=1 vs 3; Requests for review received 0+26=26 vs 29; Board action on requests ruled upon, total 0+30=30 vs 35; Board decision after review, total 0+12=12 vs 14; By Board 0+13=13 vs 17). Within each column the detail lines do add to their totals (83+17=100; 10+22+3=35; 1+1+12=14, and likewise for UC). Values are transcribed exactly as printed; nothing was adjusted. In the "By Board" row there is a small stray dash-like speck in the UC column just left of the figure 13; it is a scanning artifact, not a minus sign or a digit, and was not transcribed. The two section lines ("Review of Regional Directors' decisions:" and "Regional Directors' decisions:") end in a mark that reads as a colon in this scan; the first is slightly degraded and could be a period. The scan renders many lowercase "ti" pairs with a dotless i (e.g. "acuons" for "actions", "decisıon"); these were read as the normal words.

Source image

Source page 138 of NLRB FY1995 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1995, p. 138.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.