Formal Actions Taken in Unfair Labor Practice Cases, Fiscal Year 1995

p. 135. 14 columns: stub, \"Cases in which formal actions taken\" (a tall heading spanning all three header levels), then the 12 columns under the spanner \"Formal actions taken by type of case\" (the rule for that spanner begins at the \"Total formal actions taken\" column). The \"CD\" heading spans two columns, \"Jurisdictional disputes\" and \"Unfair labor practices\".\n\nMany cells carry a printed em-dash rule meaning \"not applicable\"; per instructions these are transcribed as \"\". The whole \"10(k) notices of hearings issued\" row is dash rules except the three values 49, 43 and 43 (CD-Jurisdictional disputes); the exact number of separate dash rules in the CE/CG/CP span of that row is hard to resolve in this 1-bit scan, but every cell there is a dash or blank and so is \"\" either way.\n\nThe scan is a degraded bitonal image in which many dotted i's and colons break up; the punctuation after \"Adopting administrative law judges' decisions (no exceptions filed)\" and after \"Contested\" prints as a single low dot, read here as a colon to match \"Upon consent of parties:\".\n\nIn \"Backpay decisions\" (the row under \"Adopting administrative law judges' decisions...\") a speck sits between the CA value 4 and the CB value 0; it is scanning dirt, not a comma or marker.\n\nAs a check on column placement, every row's across-row sum of the type-of-case columns equals its printed \"Total formal actions taken\", and each total row (Hearings completed, Decisions by administrative law judges, Decisions and orders by the Board) equals the sum of its sub-rows in both of the first two columns. No discrepancies found.