Final Outcome of Representation Elections in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1994

p. 134. Crop shows only panel "A. All representation elections" of Table 13; the table evidently continues (a panel B and the footnote texts) beyond the bottom of this crop, so no footnotes are transcribed even though marker 1 appears on the caption and marker 2 on the "Total elections" heading. Many cells carry a printed dash rule (------) meaning "not applicable"; these are transcribed as "" per instructions. Printed zeros are kept as 0. Row "AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. National": the last column ("In elections where no representative chosen") is blank on the page — the dash rule in that row sits under "In units won by: Other local unions". A 0 there would be consistent with the subtotal (3 (or more)-union elections = 228 = 228 + 0 + 0 + 0), but nothing is printed, so the cell is left "". Row label "AFL-CIO v Natinal v. Local" is transcribed as it reads on the scan: the second term appears to be a misprint (or a scan dropout) of "National", and no period is visible after the first "v". Intended label is almost certainly "AFL-CIO v. National v. Local". All AFL-CIO hyphens are printed as en-dash-like rules in this typeface; written as plain hyphens. All printed totals and subtotals cross-foot correctly against the detail rows.

p. 135. 14 columns. The crop is a continuation page ("—Continued") but does carry the full three-level column headings, so they are transcribed. It shows only panels B (Elections in RC cases) and C (Elections in RM cases); panel A and any later panels fall outside the crop, and no footnote texts are printed on this page even though footnote markers 1 (in the caption, excluded) and 2 (on "Total elections") appear. Doubtful cell: "AFL-CIO" row in section C, "Percent won" column — the decimal point is nearly lost in the scan, reading as "24 6"; transcribed as "24.6", which is consistent with 14 won of 57 elections (24.56%) and with the two-digit-plus-one-decimal format used throughout the column. Empty cells in the data body are printed as em-dash rules ("——") meaning not applicable, and are rendered as "" per instructions; printed zeros are kept as 0. Note the contrast within the "National v. Local" row, where the "Other local unions" columns carry printed 0 while the "AFL-CIO unions" columns carry dash rules. All column arithmetic verifies internally: the three single-union rows sum to each "1-union elections" line, the six two-union rows to "2-union elections", the four three-union rows to "3 (or more)-union elections", and those three subtotals to "Total RC elections" (e.g. 2,891+121+8=3,020; 173,697+11,542+1,100=186,339). Section C's "1-union elections" and "Total RM elections" lines are identical, as printed.

p. 136. This crop is a continuation page of Table 13 and contains only panel "D. Elections in RD cases"; that section line is printed centered across the data columns rather than in the stub, and is given here as a label-only row. The crop has 14 printed columns (stub plus 13 value columns). Column-2 ("Percent won") value on the "1-union elections" row reads "33 5" in the scan: the decimal point is faint/dropped by the scan, and it is transcribed as "33.5" (consistent with 163/487 = 33.5 and with the decimal style of every other cell in that column). Em-dash rules ("——") stand for nil throughout and are rendered as empty cells; printed zeros ("0") are kept as 0. In the "AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO" row the "Other national unions" cell shows a short stray mark before the dash rule, which appears to be a broken leader/rule artifact rather than a character. All rows cross-foot and cast correctly (e.g. 487 + 6 = 493; 163 + 5 = 168; 21,547 + 388 = 21,935; 10,004 + 659 + 250 = 10,913), so no misprints are suspected.