Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1994

p. 127. Three columns: stub (unlabeled in the heading band), AC, UC. The table is a single panel; no footnotes are printed beneath it and the bottom rule is visible, so nothing appears cut off. Row labels repeat across sections ("Before hearing", "After hearing", "By Regional Director's decision", "By Board decision") because the table is a hierarchy under "Certification amended or unit clarified", "Dismissed" and "Withdrawn"; indentation, not wording, distinguishes them. Internally consistent: 1+2+7 = 10 (AC) and 47+78+183 = 308 (UC) match the printed "Total, all". The scan is speckled with stray marks (e.g. a dot above "Dismissed" and near the "Withdrawn"/"Before hearing" leaders) that are dirt, not footnote markers. Under "Withdrawn" there are only two sub-rows (Before hearing, After hearing) with no "By Regional Director's decision"/"By Board decision" breakdown, as printed.