Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Jurisdictional Dispute Cases Closed Prior to Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings, Fiscal Year 1993

p. 142. Three printed columns with a single heading level. Row labels for the long "After opening of 10(k) hearing, before issuance of Board decision and determination of dispute" entries wrap onto two printed lines (hyphenated "dis-pute") and the values are printed on the second line; each is transcribed as one row. In the scan the decimal point is faded to near-invisible in three percent cells, which print as "2 4", "0 5" and "0 5": the "Agreement of the parties" sub-row "After opening of 10(k) hearing..." (Percent of total closed), and the two Withdrawal rows "After opening of 10(k) hearing..." and "After Board decision and determination of dispute" — the last of these shows its point clearly (0.5). Given the decimal format of every other cell in that column and the fact that the sub-items add exactly to their group totals (28.8+9.0+2.4=40.2; 35.6+1.9+0.5+0.5=38.5), they are transcribed as 2.4, 0.5 and 0.5. The final row "By Board decision and determination of dispute" has a dash rule in the percent column, transcribed as "". All printed totals are internally consistent (85+9+82+36=212; 40.2+4.3+38.5+17.0=100.0). The caption carries footnote marker 1, which is recorded with the caption elsewhere and so omitted here.