Remedial Actions Taken in Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1993

p. 127. The table has 14 columns: stub, "Total all", then six Employer columns and six Union columns. Crop coverage: the image ends just below the "Other remedies" row at a closing rule; no footnote texts appear on this crop, so `footnotes` is empty even though the caption carries a raised 1 and the "A. By number of cases involved" value carries a raised 2. The report's companion section (e.g. a "B. By number of employees involved" block) and the footnote definitions, if any, are not visible here. Cells printed as a short dash rule ("——"), used throughout to mark not-applicable Employer or Union columns, are transcribed as "". The "A. By number of cases involved" row shows such dash rules in all 13 value columns except "Total all". Doubtful cells: in "Reimbursement of fees, dues, and fines", the Union "Total" prints with a damaged leading digit that reads like "!12"; given the row components (79+7+1+18+7 = 112) it is transcribed as 112. In "Employees offered reinstatement", "Total all" prints as "l,293" (broken 1) and is transcribed as 1,293. The raised 2 on 11,286 is read as a footnote marker, giving 11,286^2. Nothing was computed or corrected beyond the two damaged-glyph readings named above.

p. 128. This page carries only Part B of the table; Part A ("By number of cases involved") is on the preceding page and is not in this crop. No footnote text is printed below the table on this page (the caption's superscript 1 refers to a note printed with Part A), so `footnotes` is empty. Dash rules (em-dash marks) stand in for "no data" in several cells and are transcribed as "": the whole Union block for the three reinstatement rows ("Employees offered reinstatement, total", "Accepted", "Declined"), and the whole Employer block for "Hiring hall rights restored" and "Objections to employment withdrawn". In those two Employer blocks the dash under the "Recommendation of administrative law judge" column is faint or absent in the scan, but the cell is empty either way. All printed row and column totals are internally consistent (e.g. 3,484+274+18+219+182 = 4,177; 21,106+302 = 21,408; 759+305 = 1,064), so no misprints are suspected. Stray ink specks appear in the body (near the Recommendation column of the section line, and near "122" in the backpay row); they are not digits or footnote markers.

p. 129. This crop is a continuation page: it carries only section C of Table 4 (sections A and B are on the preceding pages), but the full five-level column heading block is reprinted here, so it is transcribed. 14 columns: stub, "Total all", then six Employer columns and six Union columns. Footnote 2 is printed under the table but its raised marker does not appear anywhere on this crop (it attaches to a row or heading on an earlier page of the table); it is transcribed as printed. The footnote 1 text as printed reads "closed during fiscal year 1991" even though the table caption is for fiscal year 1993 — a probable misprint in the source, transcribed verbatim. Dollar signs are printed only on the first (section C total) row; the two data rows below carry none, as transcribed. All row and column sums in the grid check out exactly (e.g. 31,829,177 + 1,700,797 + 1,895,776 + 11,255,798 + 7,066,256 = 53,747,804; 53,747,804 + 749,657 = 54,497,461; the two data rows sum to the section C total in every column), which corroborates the digits. The Employer "Recommendation of administrative law judge" cell in the Reimbursement row and the Union same-column cell in the Backpay row are printed zeros (0), not blanks.