Formal Actions Taken in Unfair Labor Practice Cases, Fiscal Year 1993

p. 123. 14 columns: stub, "Cases in which formal actions taken", "Total formal actions taken", then CA, CB, CC, CD (split into "Jurisdictional disputes" and "Unfair labor practices"), CE, CG, CP, "CA combined with CB", "C combined with representation cases", "Other C combinations". Many cells are printed as a short dash rule (not a zero); these are transcribed as "". The "CD - Jurisdictional disputes" column is a dash rule in every row except "10(k) notices of hearings issued" (35), "Hearings completed, total" (16), "Initial ULP hearings" (16), "Decisions and orders by the Board, total" (21) and the contested "Initial ULP decisions" (21). The first row, "10(k) notices of hearings issued", is a dash rule in every column except "Cases in which formal actions taken" (48), "Total formal actions taken" (35) and "CD - Jurisdictional disputes" (35). In the row "Decisions by administrative law judges, total" there is a small stray speck immediately left of the 0 in the CE column; I read it as scanning dirt, not a footnote marker, and transcribed the cell as 0. The footnote line at the bottom is clipped by the crop (only the upper half of the letters is visible); I read it as "1 See Glossary of terms for definitions." The caption above the table is not in the crop, so the footnote's reference point is not visible. All row and column sums are internally consistent as transcribed (e.g. the Board total of 929 equals the sum of its eight sub-rows, and each row's type-of-case cells sum to its "Total formal actions taken"), so no misprints are suspected.