Board decisions issued

p. 27. No column headings are printed on this crop, so header_rows is empty. The table is an indented tabulation in which the numeric values step rightward as the indent level decreases; I read three numeric columns: the deepest-indent detail column (575, 38, 49, 21), a middle column (683), and the outermost column for the two bold summary figures (1,320 and 896). The offset between the detail column and the 683 column is small (roughly one digit width), so that column split is inferred from alignment rather than from any printed column rule. "1,320" is underscored by a double rule and "896" by a single rule; those rules are typographic emphasis, not data. The crop is cut off at the bottom — the tabulation evidently continues below (e.g. representation and other case categories), and nothing below the "Determinations in jurisdictional disputes" line is visible. A few isolated specks/dots appear in the blank area to the right of the "Initial ... stipulated record" line and under the last line; these are scan artifacts, not values or footnote markers.

p. 28. This crop is a continuation of a table from the preceding page: no column headings are printed on the image, so header_rows is empty. The grid has four columns — the stub plus three numeric columns at successive indent levels of the row labels. The innermost (leftmost numeric) column holds 3, 29, 169, 8, 1, 3, 246, 177, 1; the next column to the right holds 201 and 12 (rows whose labels start one indent level further left); the rightmost column holds only 424, on the "Noncontested decisions" line, whose label is set at the outermost indent. 424 is printed in bold with a rule underneath it, consistent with a subtotal/total. End-of-line hyphens were repaired in three labels: "Regional Di-/rectors" -> "Regional Directors", "Regional Di-/rector decisions" -> "Regional Director decisions", "chal-/lenges" -> "challenges". In "After transfer by Regional Directors...", the word "by" carries a scanning speck above the "b" that can read like an apostrophe; it is "by". A small isolated dash-like mark appears near the top right of the image, above and right of the "201" column; it is not aligned with any row or value and appears to be a scan artifact or a fragment of a rule, so it was not transcribed. The crop is cut off at the bottom immediately after the "Other ... 1" line, so any further rows (e.g., a grand total) of this table are not shown.