Final Outcome of Representation Elections in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1992

p. 163. 16 columns: stub + 15 numeric. The crop contains only section "A. All representation elections"; the caption and any later sections (B, etc.) and any footnote text are outside the crop, so `footnotes` is empty even though the stub-adjacent heading carries a raised "2" ("Total elections^2") and the body is laid out as if more sections follow. All em-dash rules ("——") are transcribed as "" per instructions; printed zeros are kept as 0. Minor scan artifacts, none affecting the values read: a stray ink dot sits under "Total elections^2" in the heading; a small tick precedes "8" in the "Other national unions" cell of the "2-union elections" row; a small tick precedes "1,926" in the "Elections in which no representative chosen" cell of the "Total representation elections" row; a stray dot precedes the dash rule in the "AFL-CIO unions" (units won by) cell of the "National v. Local" row. All row and column arithmetic in this section is internally consistent (subtotals, grand total, and each "Percent won" matches Total won / Total elections), which supports the digit readings.

p. 164. 16 columns. The page is a continuation: panel "A." of the table is not on this crop, and section "C. Elections in RM cases" is cut off after the "1-union elections" subtotal (its remaining rows and any footnotes, including the text for the ^2 marker on "Total elections", fall below the crop). The caption/running title at the very top is clipped and omitted. Long dash rules ("——") used for not-applicable cells are transcribed as empty cells, as instructed; printed zeros are kept as 0. Doubtful cells: 1. "Teamsters v. Teamsters", column "Percent won": printed as "87 5" — the decimal point is worn away in the scan. Transcribed as 87.5 (consistent with 7 of 8 elections won). 2. "3 (or more)-union elections", column "Other national unions" (under "Elections won by unions"): the mark is ambiguous at this resolution between a printed 0 and a dash rule. Transcribed as 0, because the column total requires 0 (Total RC 59 = 51 + 8 + 0), because every other subtotal row in the table prints figures rather than dashes in these columns, and because the same row prints 0 in the matching "In units won by / Other national unions" cell. The neighbouring cells in that row (Other local unions = 1, no representative chosen = 0) are fixed by the column totals and by the 100.0 percent-won figure. 3. Suspected misprint: section C "1-union elections", column "In units won by / Teamsters" reads 155, but the only component row (Teamsters) shows 115 there, and the row's own "In elections won" of 309 = 183 + 115 + 11 + 0. Transcribed as printed (155). Every other subtotal, total and row-wise sum in both panels was checked and is internally consistent, which corroborates the column assignment of the figures.

p. 165. The crop continues a table from the preceding page: the first five body rows (through \"Total RM elections\") belong to an RM-cases section whose heading and earlier rows are not on this image. Column structure: 16 columns (stub + 15). \"Elections won by unions\" spans the Percent won / Total won / AFL-CIO unions / Teamsters / Other national unions / Other local unions columns; \"Employees eligible to vote\" spans Total / In elections won / the four \"In units won by\" columns. \"Total elections^2\", \"Elections in which no representative chosen\" and \"In elections where no representative chosen\" are tall single headings repeated across all three levels. Doubtful cell: row 2 (\"AFL-CIO v. Teamsters\", first RM block), Percent won column, is printed as \"100 0\" — the decimal point did not reproduce in the scan. Transcribed as \"100.0\", consistent with every other percent cell and with 1 of 1 election won. Em-dash rules (\"——\") have been transcribed as empty cells throughout, per instruction; printed zeros are kept as 0. Footnotes: the footnote block is cut off by the bottom edge of the crop. Only the first line is partly visible and is read as \"1 See Glossary of terms for definitions.\" — the wording is inferred from a partially clipped line and should be verified. Footnote 2, referenced by the superscript on the \"Total elections\" heading, is not visible on this crop at all. Arithmetic cross-checks all pass, which supports the column assignments: the three 2-union rows sum to the \"2-union elections\" line in every column; the four single-union rows sum to \"1-union elections\"; and 1-union + 2-union + 3-or-more sum exactly to \"Total RD elections\" in all 15 data columns (e.g. 594+10+2=606; 32,670+866+638=34,174; 12,288+587+591=13,466). Within rows, \"In elections won\" plus \"In elections where no representative chosen\" equals the employees \"Total\" (e.g. 12,288+12,489=24,777). No misprints detected.