Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Jurisdictional Dispute Cases Closed Prior to Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings, Fiscal Year 1992

p. 152. The only footnote marker (raised 1) is attached to the caption, which is excluded per instructions; no marker appears on any heading, label or value in the grid. Several row labels wrap across two printed lines with an end-of-line hyphen in "dis-/pute"; these are joined as "dispute". The label text is indented in the original to show that "Before 10(k) notice", "After 10(k) notice, before opening of 10(k) hearing", "After opening of 10(k) hearing, ..." and "After/By Board decision and determination of dispute" are subdivisions of the preceding flush-left category (Agreement of the parties, Withdrawal, Dismissal); the same wording therefore repeats under each category. In the Withdrawal block, a small isolated ink speck sits in the "Percent of total closed" column on the first line of the "After opening of 10(k) hearing..." row; it is printer dirt, not a digit, and the row's value 0.7 is printed on the second line. The scan renders some dotted i's faintly (e.g. "disposition", "Compliance"), but all wording is legible. Column totals check out: 37.9 + 0.7 + 43.4 + 18.0 = 100.0, and 103 + 2 + 119 + 49 = 273.