NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1992 › Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 1992

Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 1992

printed as Table 2 · source pages 131–132 · nlrb1992_p0131_t0

Stitched from pp. 131–132.

Number of cases showing specific allegationsPercent of total cases
A. Charges filed against employers under Sec. 8(a)
Subsections of Sec. 8(a):
Total cases23,119100.0
8(a)(1)377716.3
8(a)(1)(2)2130.9
8(a)(1)(3)818735.4
8(a)(1)(4)1800.8
8(a)(1)(5)749932.4
8(a)(1)(2)(3)1780.8
8(a)(1)(2)(4)60.0
8(a)(1)(2)(5)1040.4
8(a)(1)(3)(4)6272.7
8(a)(1)(3)(5)20658.9
8(a)(1)(4)(5)270.1
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)160.1
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5)940.4
8(a)(1)(2)(4)(5)30.0
8(a)(1)(3)(4)(5)1280.6
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)150.1
Recapitulation
8(a)(1)23,119100.0
8(a)(2)6292.7
8(a)(3)11,31048.9
8(a)(4)1,0024.3
8(a)(5)9,93543.0
B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)
Subsections of Sec. 8(b):
Total cases9,249100.0
8(b)(1)6,23267.4
8(b)(2)480.5
8(b)(3)2142.3
8(b)(4)96410.4
8(b)(5)20.0
8(b)(6)40.0
8(b)(7)2082.2
8(b)(1)(2)1,16512.6
8(b)(1)(3)2993.2
8(b)(1)(5)70.1
8(b)(1)(6)140.2
8(b)(2)(3)40.0
8(b)(2)(5)30.0
8(b)(2)(6)10.0
8(b)(3)(6)10.0
8(b)(1)(2)(3)710.8
8(b)(1)(2)(5)30.0
8(b)(1)(2)(6)30.0
8(b)(1)(3)(5)20.0
8(b)(1)(3)(6)20.0
8(b)(1)(2)(3)(5)10.0
8(b)(1)(2)(5)(6)10.0
Recapitulation
8(b)(1)7,80084.3
8(b)(2)1,30014.1
8(b)(3)5946.4
8(b)(4)96410.4
8(b)(5)190.2
8(b)(6)260.3
8(b)(7)2082.2
B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)
Total cases 8(b)(4)964100.0
8(b)(4)(A)626.4
8(b)(4)(B)55457.5
8(b)(4)(C)181.9
8(b)(4)(D)28029.0
8(b)(4)(A)(B)383.9
8(b)(4)(A)(C)50.5
8(b)(4)(B)(C)50.5
8(b)(4)(A)(B)(C)20.2
Recapitulation
8(b)(4)(A)10711.1
8(b)(4)(B)59962.1
8(b)(4)(C)303.1
8(b)(4)(D)28029.0
B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)
Total cases 8(b)(7)208100.0
8(b)(7)(A)5827.9
8(b)(7)(B)167.7
8(b)(7)(C)12560.1
8(b)(7)(A)(B)31.4
8(b)(7)(A)(C)31.4
8(b)(7)(B)(C)21.0
8(b)(7)(A)(B)(C)10.5
Recapitulation
8(b)(7)(A)6531.3
8(b)(7)(B)2210.6
8(b)(7)(C)13163.0
C. Charges filed under Sec. 8(e)
Total cases 8(e)45100.0
Against unions alone45100.0
D. Charges filed under Sec. 8(g)
Total cases 8(g)29100.0

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the various allegations is greater than the total number of cases.
  2. 2 Sec. 8(a)(1) is a general provision forbidding any type of employer interference with the rights of the employees guaranteed by the Act, and therefore is included in all charges of employer unfair labor practices.

0 of 79 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 131. Three columns: stub, "Number of cases showing specific allegations", "Percent of total cases"; a single heading level. Row labels: in the scan the ")(" between subsection numbers is degraded and frequently prints as a single "X"-like glyph (e.g. "8(a)(1X2", "8(aX3)", "8(bX1X2X3)"), and the closing parenthesis of the last group in Part A is often swallowed by the leader dots. I have transcribed these as the intended "8(a)(1)(2)", "8(a)(3)", "8(b)(1)(2)(3)" etc.; the digits inside each group are legible and are what I read off the page. Digit grouping is inconsistent as printed: 3777, 8187, 7499 and 2065 carry no thousands comma, while 23,119, 11,310, 1,002, 9,935, 9,249, 6,232 and 1,165 do. Transcribed as printed. Decimal points lost in the scan: the percent for 8(b)(1) prints as "67 4" and for 8(b)(2)(5) as "0 0". Read as 67.4 and 0.0 respectively, consistent with every other value in that column. Footnote markers 1 (on the centered "Recapitulation" line) and 2 (on the 8(a)(1) recapitulation row) appear, but no footnote text is printed within this crop — the table continues past the bottom rule, so the Part B recapitulation and the footnote block are on the following page. The centered lines "A. Charges filed against employers under Sec. 8(a)", "Recapitulation^1" and "B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)" are section headings inside the body and are given as label-only rows.

p. 132. This is a continuation page of Table 2; the sole heading level is printed over the two value columns and the stub heading is blank. The second value column's heading reads "Number of cases showing specific al-legations" in the image; the end-of-line hyphen was repaired to "allegations". The three centred "Recapitulation^1" lines and the four lettered/numbered section lines (B1, B2, C, D) are label-only rows with no values, transcribed with empty value cells. Footnote 2 is printed under this page but its marker appears nowhere on this crop; it refers to Sec. 8(a)(1) material in the part of the table carried on the preceding page. Minor scan artifacts, not transcribed: a stray tick mark just below the "Total cases 8(b)(4)" label, a small mark in the leader-dot field of the "Total cases 8(b)(7)" row, and a short dash in the left margin of the number column beside "8(b)(7)(A)(C)". None of them changes a digit; the value for 8(b)(7)(A)(C) is 3 / 1.4. No internal inconsistencies found: the recapitulation subtotals and all percentages agree with the detail lines as printed.

Source image

Source page 131 of NLRB FY1992 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1992, p. 131.
Source page 132 of NLRB FY1992 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1992, p. 132.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.