NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1991 › Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1991

Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1991

printed as Table 3C · source page 174 · nlrb1991_p0174_t0

Types of formal actions takenCases in which formal actions takenFormal actions taken by type of case
Types of formal actions takenCases in which formal actions takenACUC
Hearings completed59453
Decisions issued after hearing68461
By Regional Directors62457
By Board604
Transferred by Regional Directors for initial decision000
Review of Regional Directors' decisions:
Requests for review received47245
Withdrawn before request ruled upon000
Board action on requests ruled upon, total36232
Granted907
Denied27225
Remanded000
Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review000
Board decision after review, total604
Regional Directors' decisions.
Affirmed402
Modified000
Reversed202

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 See Glossary of terms for definitions

0 of 28 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 174. Four printed columns: stub, \"Cases in which formal actions taken\", and AC / UC under the spanner \"Formal actions taken by type of case\". The stub heading and the \"Cases in which formal actions taken\" heading each span both heading levels.\n\nMany rows do not add across as printed (AC + UC vs. the first column); transcribed exactly as printed, no values corrected. Non-adding rows: Hearings completed (59 vs 4+53=57); Decisions issued after hearing (68 vs 4+61=65); By Regional Directors (62 vs 4+57=61); By Board (6 vs 0+4=4); Board action on requests ruled upon, total (36 vs 2+32=34); Granted (9 vs 0+7=7); Board decision after review, total (6 vs 0+4=4); Affirmed (4 vs 0+2=2). The rows Requests for review received, Denied and Reversed do add. This pattern suggests possible misprints in the source, not a misreading of column placement.\n\nThe UC cell of \"Hearings completed\" has a stray ink dot to the left of 53 (a leader-dot/speck artifact); the value read is 53.\n\nTwo section labels: \"Review of Regional Directors' decisions:\" ends in a clear colon. The label rendered here as \"Regional Directors' decisions.\" is printed with what reads as a period in this scan, but given the parallel construction and the indented sub-rows beneath it (Affirmed / Modified / Reversed), it is most likely a colon degraded by the scan.\n\nRow labels in the source carry several levels of indentation (e.g. By Regional Directors, Granted / Denied / Remanded, Affirmed / Modified / Reversed are indented under their parents); indentation is not represented in the grid.\n\nThe caption carries footnote marker 1, which is the footnote transcribed below the table; the caption itself is omitted per instructions.

Source image

Source page 174 of NLRB FY1991 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1991, p. 174.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.