NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1991 › Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1991
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | Formal actions taken by type of case | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | AC | UC |
| Hearings completed | 59 | 4 | 53 |
| Decisions issued after hearing | 68 | 4 | 61 |
| By Regional Directors | 62 | 4 | 57 |
| By Board | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| Transferred by Regional Directors for initial decision | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Review of Regional Directors' decisions: | |||
| Requests for review received | 47 | 2 | 45 |
| Withdrawn before request ruled upon | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Board action on requests ruled upon, total | 36 | 2 | 32 |
| Granted | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| Denied | 27 | 2 | 25 |
| Remanded | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Board decision after review, total | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| Regional Directors' decisions. | |||
| Affirmed | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Modified | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reversed | 2 | 0 | 2 |
0 of 28 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 174. Four printed columns: stub, \"Cases in which formal actions taken\", and AC / UC under the spanner \"Formal actions taken by type of case\". The stub heading and the \"Cases in which formal actions taken\" heading each span both heading levels.\n\nMany rows do not add across as printed (AC + UC vs. the first column); transcribed exactly as printed, no values corrected. Non-adding rows: Hearings completed (59 vs 4+53=57); Decisions issued after hearing (68 vs 4+61=65); By Regional Directors (62 vs 4+57=61); By Board (6 vs 0+4=4); Board action on requests ruled upon, total (36 vs 2+32=34); Granted (9 vs 0+7=7); Board decision after review, total (6 vs 0+4=4); Affirmed (4 vs 0+2=2). The rows Requests for review received, Denied and Reversed do add. This pattern suggests possible misprints in the source, not a misreading of column placement.\n\nThe UC cell of \"Hearings completed\" has a stray ink dot to the left of 53 (a leader-dot/speck artifact); the value read is 53.\n\nTwo section labels: \"Review of Regional Directors' decisions:\" ends in a clear colon. The label rendered here as \"Regional Directors' decisions.\" is printed with what reads as a period in this scan, but given the parallel construction and the indented sub-rows beneath it (Affirmed / Modified / Reversed), it is most likely a colon degraded by the scan.\n\nRow labels in the source carry several levels of indentation (e.g. By Regional Directors, Granted / Denied / Remanded, Affirmed / Modified / Reversed are indented under their parents); indentation is not represented in the grid.\n\nThe caption carries footnote marker 1, which is the footnote transcribed below the table; the caption itself is omitted per instructions.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.