NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1991 › Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 1991

Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 1991

printed as Table 2 · source pages 169–170 · nlrb1991_p0169_t0

Stitched from pp. 169–170.

Number of cases showing specific allegationsPercent of total cases
A. Charges filed against employers under Sec. 8(a)
Subsections of Sec. 8(a)
Total cases23,005100.0
8(a)(1)3,80516.5
8(a)(1)(2)2441.1
8(a)(1)(3)8,18935.6
8(a)(1)(4)1650.7
8(a)(1)(5)7,39832.2
8(a)(1)(2)(3)1760.8
8(a)(1)(2)(4)60.0
8(a)(1)(2)(5)990.4
8(a)(1)(3)(4)5672.5
8(a)(1)(3)(5)2,0769.0
8(a)(1)(4)(5)220.1
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)190.1
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5)1100.5
8(a)(1)(2)(4)(5)10.0
8(a)(1)(3)(4)(5)1010.4
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)270.1
Recapitulation
8(a)(1)23,005100.0
8(a)(2)6823.0
8(a)(3)11,26549.0
8(a)(4)9083.9
8(a)(5)9,83442.7
B. Charges filed against unions under Sec. 8(b)
Subsections of Sec. 8(b).
Total cases9,099100.0
8(b)(1)6,13767.4
8(b)(2)610.7
8(b)(3)1741.9
8(b)(4)96710.6
8(b)(5)70.1
8(b)(6)110.1
8(b)(7)2112.3
8(b)(1)(2)1,06011.6
8(b)(1)(3)3774.1
8(b)(1)(5)170.2
8(b)(1)(6)90.1
8(b)(2)(3)30.0
8(b)(2)(5)10.0
8(b)(2)(6)10.0
8(b)(3)(6)10.0
8(b)(1)(2)(3)500.5
8(b)(1)(2)(5)30.0
8(b)(1)(2)(6)30.0
8(b)(1)(3)(5)30.0
8(b)(1)(3)(6)10.0
8(b)(1)(2)(5)(6)20.0
Recapitulation
8(b)(1)7,66284.2
8(b)(2)1,18413.0
8(b)(3)6096.7
8(b)(4)96710.6
8(b)(5)330.4
8(b)(6)280.3
8(b)(7)2112.3
B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)
Total cases 8(b)(4)967100.0
8(b)(4)(A)767.9
8(b)(4)(B)60262.3
8(b)(4)(C)90.9
8(b)(4)(D)23624.4
8(b)(4)(A)(B)353.6
8(b)(4)(A)(C)50.5
8(b)(4)(B)(C)20.2
8(b)(4)(A)(B)(C)20.2
Recapitulation
8(b)(4)(A)11812.2
8(b)(4)(B)64166.3
8(b)(4)(C)181.9
8(b)(4)(D)23624.4
B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)
Total cases 8(b)(7)211100.0
8(b)(7)(A)5526.1
8(b)(7)(B)209.5
8(b)(7)(C)12257.8
8(b)(7)(A)(B)41.9
8(b)(7)(A)(C)62.8
8(b)(7)(B)(C)31.4
8(b)(7)(A)(B)(C)10.5
Recapitulation
8(b)(7)(A)6631.3
8(b)(7)(B)2813.3
8(b)(7)(C)13262.6
C. Charges filed under Sec. 8(e)
Total cases 8(e)148100.0
Against unions alone7148.0
Against employers alone7752.0
D. Charges filed under Sec. 8(g)
Total cases 8(g)19100.0

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the various allegations is greater than the total number of cases.
  2. 2 Sec. 8(a)(1) is a general provision forbidding any type of employer interference with the rights of the employees guaranteed by the Act, and therefore is included in all charges of employer unfair labor practices.

0 of 79 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 169. Three printed columns: stub (no heading printed over it), "Number of cases showing specific allegations", "Percent of total cases". The stub heading cell is blank in the original. Row labels of the form 8(a)(1)(2) are printed with tight ")(" pairs that the scan renders like "8(aX1X2)"; they are transcribed in their intended form 8(a)(1)(2). Row "8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)", Percent column: the decimal point has dropped out in the scan, so it reads "0 1". Transcribed as 0.1 on the strength of the column's uniform one-decimal format; the printed glyph is ambiguous. Footnote markers are printed in the body — a raised 1 on the "Recapitulation" section line and a raised 2 on the Recapitulation row "8(a)(1)" — but no footnote text appears within this crop; the footnotes presumably sit below the cut or on the facing page. The table body also appears to continue past the bottom rule (sections C and D for Sec. 8(e)/8(g) charges are not on this image). The crop's bottom rule follows the row "8(b)(1)(2)(5)(6)"; nothing below it is visible.

p. 170. The crop is a continuation page: the table has three columns (stub, "Number of cases showing specific allegations", "Percent of total cases") and the stub heading is blank in the printed header. The centered lines "Recapitulation^1", "B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)", "B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)", "C. Charges filed under Sec. 8(e)" and "D. Charges filed under Sec. 8(g)" are section headers spanning the table width and carry no values. Footnote 2 is printed under the table but its marker appears only on the earlier portion of the table (the 8(a) section on the preceding page), not on this crop. The scan renders many dotted i's without their dots (e.g. "Recapitulation", "allegations", "Against unions alone"); these are transcribed conventionally. A faint stray mark sits in the "Percent of total cases" column just below the header rule, above the first "Recapitulation" band; it is a scanning artifact, not a value. All printed percentages are consistent with the printed counts.

Source image

Source page 169 of NLRB FY1991 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1991, p. 169.
Source page 170 of NLRB FY1991 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1991, p. 170.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.