NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1989 › NLRB Activity Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, Fiscal Year 1989
NLRB Activity Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, Fiscal Year 1989
| I. Applications for fees and expenses before the NLRB: | |
|---|---|
| A. Filed with Board | 11 |
| B. Hearings held | 0 |
| C. Awards ruled on: | |
| 1. By administrative law judges. | |
| Granting | 1 |
| Denying | 17 |
| 2. By Board: | |
| Granting | 3 |
| Denying | 21 |
| D. Amount of fees and expenses in cases ruled on by Board: | |
| Claimed | $430,526.66 |
| Recovered | $40,534.24 |
| II. Applications for fees and expenses before the circuit courts of appeals: | |
| A. Awards ruled on: | |
| Granting | 2 |
| Denying | 4 |
| B. Amounts of fees and expenses recovered pursuant to court award | $43,956.70 |
| III. Applications for fees and expenses before the district courts: | |
| A. Awards ruled on: | |
| Granting | 0 |
| Denying | 0 |
| B. Amounts of fees and expenses recovered pursuant to court award | 0 |
- 1 These 18 cases do not include 5 EAJA cases which administrative law judges' settled without conducting a hearing.
- * In one instance, three applications were received in a consolidated proceeding.
0 of 7 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
Reader’s notes
p. 262. The table has no printed column headings: it is a two-column list of labelled lines with a single right-hand value column, so header_rows is empty. Roman-numeral and lettered section lines (I., C., 2., D., II., A., III.) carry no value and are given as "". The "Granting" cell under "C. 1. By administrative law judges" is printed as the digit 1 followed by a small raised 1 (the footnote marker), transcribed as 1^1; footnote 1's reference to "These 18 cases" supports reading the value as 1 (1 granting + 17 denying = 18) rather than as 11. The "Denying" cell under "C. 2. By Board" carries a raised asterisk, transcribed as 21^*. Row label "1. By administrative law judges." appears to end with a period rather than the colon used on the parallel line "2. By Board:"; it is transcribed as printed, but the mark is small and could be a broken colon in the scan. In footnote 1, "judges'" is printed with an apostrophe before "settled", which looks like a typesetting error; it is transcribed as printed. The final value (III. B.) is printed as a bare 0 with no dollar sign, unlike the other money cells.
Source image
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.