NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1989 › Size of Units in Representation Elections in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1989

Size of Units in Representation Elections in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1989

printed as Table 17 · source pages 252–253 · nlrb1989_p0252_t0

Stitched from pp. 252–253.

Size of unit (number of employees)Number eligible to voteTotal electionsPercent of totalCumulative percent of totalElections in which representation rights were won byElections in which no representative was chosen
Size of unit (number of employees)Number eligible to voteTotal electionsPercent of totalCumulative percent of totalAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsElections in which no representative was chosen
Size of unit (number of employees)Number eligible to voteTotal electionsPercent of totalCumulative percent of totalNumberPercent by size classNumberPercent by size classNumberPercent by size classNumberPercent of size classNumberPercent by size class
A. Certification elections (RC and RM)
Total RC and RM elections247,6383,791100.01,228100.0462100.049100.0139100.01,913100.0
Under 104,62584022.222.231025.214832.0714.32115.135418.5
10 to 1910,81377320.442.626321.412426.81122.42518.035018.3
20 to 2911,37947212.555.117314.15612.148.21611.522311.6
30 to 3910,0902967.862.9846.8326.948.2118.01658.6
40 to 499,6732195.868.7665.4235.048.21611.51105.8
50 to 599,5341754.673.3635.1112.436.264.3924.8
60 to 698,7271363.676.9433.5102.2032.2804.2
70 to 798,8171193.180.0362.9102.2053.6683.6
80 to 898,121962.582.5312.581.712.053.6512.7
90 to 998,300882.384.8252.051.1510.353.6482.5
100 to 1096,559631.786.5181.451.1010.7392.0
110 to 1195,374471.287.7141.151.112.021.4251.3
120 to 1294,841391.088.780.70032.2281.5
130 to 1396,709501.390.070.6012.064.3361.9
140 to 1494,793330.990.970.640.912.021.4191.0
150 to 1593,707240.691.570.610.200160.8
160 to 1694,459270.792.250.420.412.010.7180.9
170 to 1793,520200.592.760.510.200130.7
180 to 1894,596250.793.480.720.400150.8
190 to 1993,708190.593.970.610.212.010.790.5
200 to 29924,8301022.696.5231.892.012.064.3633.3
300 to 39915,734461.297.7100.851.124.10291.5
400 to 49911,722260.798.470.60010.7180.9
500 to 5999,678180.598.920.2000160.8
600 to 79910,772160.499.310.10032.2120.6
800 to 9995,22260.299.510.100050.3
1,000 to 1,99916,528120.399.810.1024.1090.5
2,000 to 2,9994,69820.199.9000020.1
3,000 to 9,99910,10920.1100.020.20000
B. Decertification elections (RD)
Total RD elections26,137622100.0100100.058100.02100.021100.0441100.0
Under 101,09619030.530.577.01932.8014.816337.0
10 to 191,80413020.951.41919.01119.1150.029.59722.0
20 to 291,6977111.462.81616.0610.30314.24610.4
30 to 391,276386.168.977.046.9014.8265.8
40 to 491,925447.176.01010.046.9014.8296.5
50 to 591,484274.380.399.035.20314.2122.7
60 to 691,289203.283.577.011.7014.8112.5
70 to 791,031142.385.8023.400122.7
80 to 89922111.887.611.00014.892.0
90 to 991,132121989.533.011.7029.561.4
100 to 1091,349132.191.633.023.4029.561.4
110 to 11980571.192.711.035.2014.820.5
120 to 12949340.693.311.000030.7
130 to 13994271.194.43300029.520.5
140 to 14928420.394.711.000010.2
150 to 15946830.595.200014.820.5
160 to 16965740.695.811.011.70020.5
170 to 19992850.896.611.011.70030.7
200 to 2992,574101.898.455.000051.1
300 to 4993,43191.499.844.00150.0040.9
500 to 79955010.2100.011.00000

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 See Glossary of terms for definitions.

293 of 293 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 252. CROP: The image shows only panel A ("A. Certification elections (RC and RM)") and ends after the "3,000 to 9,999" row; the table continues beyond this crop (a further section and the text of footnote 1, which is called out by the superscript 1 in the caption, are not on this image), so `footnotes` is empty. DASH RULES: Every "------" dash rule (the Cumulative-percent cell of the "Total RC and RM elections" row and the many zero-percent cells) is transcribed as "". DROPPED DECIMAL POINTS (scan artefact, not a misprint in the figure): three cells print with a gap where the decimal point has faded out. "50 to 59" / Cumulative percent of total reads "73 3" — transcribed 73.3, confirmed because the cumulative series requires 68.7 + 4.6 = 73.3. "140 to 149" / Teamsters Percent by size class reads "0 9" — transcribed 0.9 (4/462 = 0.87). "300 to 399" / Teamsters Percent by size class reads "1 1" — transcribed 1.1 (5/462 = 1.08). DOUBTFUL CELLS (transcribed exactly as read; the final digit is small and the recomputed value differs by 0.1, so either the original rounds oddly or I have misread the last digit): "90 to 99" / Other national unions Percent by size class = 10.3 (5/49 = 10.2); "50 to 59" / Other national unions Percent by size class = 6.2 (3/49 = 6.1); "30 to 39" / Other local unions Percent of size class = 8.0 (11/139 = 7.9). All other percent cells reproduce exactly from the printed counts. HEADING AS PRINTED: the third-level heading under "Other local unions" reads "Percent of size class", while the AFL-CIO, Teamsters, Other national and no-representative blocks all read "Percent by size class". Transcribed as printed. "AFL-CIO" is set with an en dash in the original and is written here with a hyphen. VERIFICATION: all 29 data rows satisfy AFL-CIO + Teamsters + Other national + Other local + no-representative = Total elections; the Total-elections column sums to the printed 3,791 and the Number-eligible-to-vote column sums to the printed 247,638; the five "Number" totals (1,228 + 462 + 49 + 139 + 1,913) also sum to 3,791. No internal inconsistency was found in the integer columns.

p. 253. The crop shows only panel B of the table; the caption and panel A are on an earlier page, so the printed heading band at the top of this image is the one transcribed here. Column structure: 15 columns (stub + 4 single columns + four two-column winner groups + a two-column "no representative was chosen" group). "Elections in which no representative was chosen" spans heading levels 1-2; the stub and the four single columns span all three levels. Dash rules ("——") in the cumulative-percent and percent-by-size-class cells are transcribed as empty cells, per instruction. Apparent misprints, transcribed exactly as printed: - "90 to 99", Percent of total: printed "19" with no decimal point. The cumulative column (87.6 -> 89.5) and 12/622 = 1.93 both imply 1.9; the decimal point is missing or did not reproduce in the scan. - "130 to 139", AFL-CIO unions / Percent by size class: printed "30" with no decimal point. 3/100 implies 3.0; the decimal point is missing in the scan. - "200 to 299", Percent of total: printed 1.8, but 10/622 = 1.6. The printed cumulative column is internally consistent with 1.8 (96.6 + 1.8 = 98.4), so the source itself is inconsistent here; transcribed as printed. Doubtful small-type cells (reading is my best judgment at this resolution; all are in the two-decimal percent columns): - "10 to 19", Teamsters / Percent by size class: read as 19.1; 11/58 = 19.0, so this may be 19.0 in the original. - "30 to 39", no representative chosen / Percent by size class: read as 5.8; 26/441 = 5.9. - "40 to 49", no representative chosen / Percent by size class: read as 6.5; 29/441 = 6.6. - "60 to 69", no representative chosen / Percent by size class: read as 2.5; 11/441 = 2.49. Verification performed: all five count columns sum exactly to their printed totals (eligible to vote 26,137; total elections 622; AFL-CIO 100; Teamsters 58; other national 2; other local 21; no representative 441), and the cumulative-percent column reproduces the running sum of the percent-of-total column at every row. This confirms the row-to-column alignment. The row label printed as "80 to 89." carries a period before the leader dots; transcribed as "80 to 89".

Source image

Source page 252 of NLRB FY1989 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1989, p. 252.
Source page 253 of NLRB FY1989 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1989, p. 253.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.