NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1989 › Final Outcome of Representation Elections in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1989

Final Outcome of Representation Elections in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1989

printed as Table 13 · source pages 234–236 · nlrb1989_p0234_t0

Stitched from pp. 234–236; a later page prints different headings, kept as rows.

A. All representation elections
AFL-CIO2,69347.61,2811,2811,412168,32261,04461,044107,278
Teamsters1,26639.650150176561,30016,14016,14045,160
Other national unions7648.73737395,3052,3692,3692,936
Other local unions22751.111611611112,5716,8876,8875,684
1-union elections4,26245.41,9351,281501371162,327247,49886,44061,04416,1402,3696,887161,058
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO3275.0242489,8358,6698,6691,166
AFL-CIO v. Teamsters2075.01551051,419856178678563
AFL-CIO v. National1283.3104622,4822,4724951,97710
AFL-CIO v. Local4488.639132657,2246,7703,8912,879454
Teamsters v. National2100.02110828270120
Teamsters v. Local1888.9167921,2911,26094131931
Teamsters v. Teamsters333.311260131347
National v. Local1172.786232,3881,9791,769210409
National v. National1100.01103434340
Local v. Local6100.06603643643640
2-union elections14981.9122461914432725,17922,49913,2331,7023,7923,7722,680
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. Local1100.0110042442442400
AFL-CIO v. Local v. Local1100.0101067467406740
3 (or more)-union elections2100.02100101,0981,098424006740
Total representation elections4,41346.72,0591,328520511602,354273,775110,03774,70117,8426,16111,333163,738
Participating unionsTotal electionsElections won by unionsElections won by unionsElections won by unionsElections won by unionsElections won by unionsElections won by unionsElections in which no representative chosenEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteIn elections where no representative chosen
Participating unionsTotal electionsPercent wonTotal wonAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsElections in which no representative chosenTotalIn elections wonIn units won byIn units won byIn units won byIn units won byIn elections where no representative chosen
Participating unionsTotal electionsPercent wonTotal wonAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsElections in which no representative chosenTotalIn elections wonAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsIn elections where no representative chosen
B. Elections in RC cases
AFL-CIO2,25551.61,1641,1641,091147,90853,24553,24594,663
Teamsters1,04141.843543560655,62713,95513,95541,672
Other national unions6453.13434304,6101,8691,8692,741
Other local unions17855.699997910,4275,8615,8614,566
1-union elections3,53849.01,7321,16443534991,806218,57274,93053,24513,9551,8695,861143,642
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO2871.4202089,4858,3198,3191,166
AFL-CIO v. Teamsters1770.612575967404178226563
AFL-CIO v. National1283.3104622,4822,4724951,97710
AFL-CIO v. Local3786.532102256,4606,0063,4952,511454
Teamsters v. National2100.02110828270120
Teamsters v. Local1593.3147711,1941,17194123023
Teamsters v. Teamsters250.01112013137
National v. Local1172.786232,3881,9791,769210409
National v. National1100.01103434340
Local v. Local5100.05502632632630
2-union elections13080.8105391614362523,37520,74312,4871,2503,7923,2142,632
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. Local1100.0110042442442400
AFL-CIO v. Local v. Local1100.0101067467406740
3 (or more)-union elections2100.02100101,0981,098424006740
Total RC elections3,67050.11,8391,204451481361,831243,04596,77166,15615,2055,6619,749146,274
C. Elections in RM cases
AFL-CIO7030.02121492,7959129121,883
Teamsters3522.988276627373589
Other national unions333.3112123252598
Other local unions633.3224151666685
Participating unionsTotal electionsPercent wonTotal wonElections won by unionsElections won by unionsElections won by unionsElections won by unionsElections in which no representative chosenEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to voteEmployees eligible to vote
Participating unionsTotal electionsPercent wonTotal wonAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsElections in which no representative chosenTotalIn elections wonIn units won byIn units won byIn units won byIn units won byIn elections where no representative chosen
Participating unionsTotal electionsPercent wonTotal wonAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsElections in which no representative chosenTotalIn elections wonAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsIn elections where no representative chosen
1-union elections11428.13221812823,7311,0769127325662,655
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO3100.03303283283280
AFL-CIO v. Teamsters3100.0303045245204520
Teamsters v. Local1100.0101082820820
2-union elections7100.07330108628623284520820
Total RM elections12132.239241113824,5931,9381,240525251482,655
D. Elections in RD cases
AFL-CIO36826.1969627217,6196,8876,88710,732
Teamsters19030.558581325,0112,1122,1122,899
Other national unions922.222757247547597
Other local unions4334.91515281,9939609601,033
1-union elections61028.0171965821543925,19510,4346,8872,11247596014,761
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO1100.01102222220
AFL-CIO v. Local7100.073407647643963680
Teamsters v. Local250.01011157078
Teamsters v. Teamsters10.0001400040
Local v. Local1100.01101011011010
2-union elections1283.310400629428944180047648
Total RD elections62229.11811005822144126,13711,3287,3052,1124751,43614,809

Download this table (CSV)

550 of 550 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 234. The crop shows only the body of the table: no column headings are printed on this image, so header_rows is empty. The grid has 16 columns (stub + 15 ruled data columns); by their arithmetic they are: number of elections; percent won by unions; elections won by unions (total); won by AFL-CIO; by Teamsters; by other national; by other local; elections lost by unions; valid votes cast; votes for unions (total); for AFL-CIO; for Teamsters; for other national; for other local; votes against. Top line: the centered section line "A. All representation elections" is sliced horizontally by the crop — only the lower half of the letters survives. The reading is legible and consistent with the lettered panel headings used in this table, but it is partly cut off; it is transcribed as a label-only row. Dropped decimal points: the percent column prints "48 7" for "Other national unions" and "45 4" for "1-union elections" (the period did not survive the scan). Transcribed as 48.7 and 45.4; both are confirmed by the data — 37/76 = 48.7 and 1,935/4,262 = 45.4. Row label "AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. Local": the second "v" is printed without a visible period (the companion row "AFL-CIO v. Local v. Local" shows both periods clearly); the period was supplied here, so the abbreviation may be bare "v" as printed. Em-dash rules (used throughout for "not applicable") are rendered as empty cells per instruction; printed zeros are kept as 0, and the distinction between the two is clear in the image (e.g. the 3-or-more-union rows print 0 where the 1- and 2-union rows print rules). No footnote markers and no footnote block appear within the crop. All subtotals ("1-union elections", "2-union elections", "3 (or more)-union elections") and the grand total row were checked against their components and the votes-cast identities in every column; every one agrees as transcribed, so no misprints are suspected.

p. 235. The crop is cut off at the bottom: panel "C. Elections in RM cases" is incomplete (its multi-union rows and "Total RM elections" line continue on the following page), and no footnote texts appear on this image (the caption carries a superscript 1 and the "Total elections" heading a superscript 2, but their notes are printed elsewhere). Columns: 16 printed columns. The long em-dash rules used throughout for "none" are transcribed as empty cells per instruction; printed zeros are kept as 0. Note this means a dash and a 0 are distinguished in the source (e.g. in "AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. Local" the Teamsters and Other national columns show dashes while Other local shows 0). Doubtful characters, all resolved against the printed totals: - Teamsters (RC section), "Percent won": the decimal point is broken in the scan and reads "41 8"; transcribed 41.8 (435/1,041 = 41.8). - "AFL-CIO v. Local v. Local", "Percent won": decimal point faint, reads "100 0"; transcribed 100.0. - "AFL-CIO v. National" and "AFL-CIO v. Local" row labels: the period after "v" is faint/absent in the scan; written with "v." to match the other rows in the block. - "Other local unions" in section C, "Total won": a small raised dot/speck precedes the 2 ("·2"). It appears to be scanner dirt rather than a footnote marker (no matching footnote is visible, and 2/6 = 33.3 matches the printed percent); transcribed as 2. All row and column totals in the RC panel were checked and are internally consistent as transcribed; no misprints found.

p. 236. Orientation: the table is printed sideways on the page (rotated 90 degrees counter-clockwise relative to reading orientation); the crop was not uprighted. I transcribed it in reading orientation: the stub "Participating unions" band runs along the bottom of the image and the column headings along the left edge. Continuation page: the crop begins in the middle of the RM-cases section, so the four 1-union category rows for RM (AFL-CIO, Teamsters, Other national unions, Other local unions) are on the preceding page; the first row here is their "1-union elections" subtotal. The caption/"Continued" line is above the crop. Column headings: "Elections won by unions" is a top-level heading that, by its printed width, spans only the four union-type columns (AFL-CIO unions, Teamsters, Other national unions, Other local unions), mirroring "In units won by" on the employees side; "Percent won" and "Total won" read as tall standalone headings spanning all heading levels. This is the one structural judgement I am least sure of — if the span is wider it would also cover "Percent won" and "Total won". "Total elections" carries a small raised digit I read as 2 (written "Total elections^2"). The footnote text itself is not printed on this crop, so `footnotes` is empty. Dash rules ("—") marking not-applicable cells are transcribed as "" throughout; printed zeros are kept as 0. The table distinguishes the two consistently (a union that took part but won nothing shows 0, e.g. AFL-CIO = 0 in "AFL-CIO v. Teamsters"; a union not party to the election shows a dash). Doubtful cells: (a) "Teamsters v. Teamsters", column "In elections won" (employees) — the printed glyph is faint at this scale; I read 0, which is required by the column's 2-union subtotal of 894 (22+764+7+0+101) and matches the 0 printed for that row under "Total won". (b) "Teamsters v. Local" (RM panel), column "Teamsters" under "In units won by" — read as 0 rather than a dash, by analogy with the 0 printed for the same row in the "Teamsters" elections-won column. (c) The section line reads "D Elections in RD cases"; I have written "D. Elections in RD cases" because the period after the D is faint but appears present. All printed totals and subtotals cross-check: row sums (component unions to "Total won" / "In elections won"), column sums (1-union and 2-union components to their subtotals and to the RM/RD totals), the identity Total elections = Total won + Elections with no representative chosen, the identity Employees total = In elections won + In elections where no representative chosen, and the Percent won figures. No misprints found.

Source image

Source page 234 of NLRB FY1989 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1989, p. 234.
Source page 235 of NLRB FY1989 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1989, p. 235.
Source page 236 of NLRB FY1989 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1989, p. 236.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.