Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Jurisdictional Dispute Cases Closed Prior to Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings, Fiscal Year 1989

p. 223. The table has three printed columns and a single heading level. The first body row ("Total number of cases closed before issuance of complaint") is a total row, printed indented and set off by a rule; the four method groups (Agreement of the parties—informal settlement, Compliance with Board decision and determination of dispute, Withdrawal, Dismissal) are flush-left group totals, each followed by indented stage rows. Indentation is not representable in the grid, so it is described here only. "Percent of total closed" for the row "Before 10(k) notice" under Dismissal: the scan shows "18 9" with no visible decimal point; every other percent cell carries one, and the group's stage percentages (18.9 + 2.9 + 0.8 + 0.4) sum to the printed group total 23.0, so it is transcribed as 18.9 (the period is lost in the scan, not absent from the print). The label "After opening of 10(k) hearing, before issuance of Board decision and determination of dispute" occurs three times and wraps onto two printed lines each time; the lines have been joined. "Before 10(k) notice" and "After 10(k) notice, before opening of 10(k) hearing" each occur three times, once per group; their repetition is in the source, not a transcription error. All printed arithmetic checks out as transcribed: 109 + 0 + 78 + 56 = 243 cases, and 44.9 + 0.0 + 32.1 + 23.0 = 100.0 percent; each group's stage rows also sum to its group total in both columns. No misprints suspected, no part of the table cut off by the crop. The caption carries footnote marker 1, which the footnote answers; the caption itself is omitted per instructions.