Distribution of Unfair Labor Practice Situations Received, by Number of Employees in Establishments, Fiscal Year 1988

p. 254. The crop is cut off at the bottom: the last fully printed row, 3,000-3,999, sits on the bottom edge (its digits are slightly clipped but legible), and the table continues onto further size classes below the crop, so the column sums here fall short of the printed totals as expected (e.g. "Total number of situations" reaches 27,180 of the printed 27,970). No footnote text is visible in the crop, although the caption carries a superscript 1 marker. 22 columns: stub, "Total number of situations", two "Total" percent columns, then a Number/Percent pair for each of CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CG, CP, CA-CB combinations and Other C combinations. The "Cumulative percent of all situations" cell in the Total row holds a single em dash rule and is transcribed as an empty cell. The scan is a coarse bitonal one in which many decimal points in the percent columns are dropped or printed as a faint gap (e.g. "19 7", "9 3", "46 7", "0 0", "100"). These have been transcribed with the decimal point restored; every restoration was checked against the arithmetic (share of the column total and the running cumulative percent) and all agreed, so the placement is not in doubt. Verification performed: for all 31 size-class rows the nine type-of-situation counts sum exactly to the printed "Total number of situations", and the Total row likewise sums to 27,970; the cumulative-percent column also chains correctly from 27.4 to 97.1. No internal inconsistency or apparent misprint was found. One doubtful area: in the "Other C combinations - Number of situations" column (the rightmost pair), the rendered image shows stray ink to the left of the digit in several rows (130-139, 170-179, 190-199, 600-699, 700-799, 800-899, 900-999), which at this resolution can read as a spurious leading digit matching the row label. The accompanying "Percent by size class" entries (0.0 in all of those rows except 170-179, which reads 1.1) and the row and column sums both fix these cells at 0, and at 1 for 170-179; they are transcribed accordingly. There is a small stray mark directly above the value 88 in the Total row of "Other C combinations - Number of situations". It appears to be a speck in the scan rather than a footnote marker, and has not been transcribed.

p. 255. This crop is the tail of a continued table (22 columns): only the last three size classes are present; the earlier size-class rows and any total row are on the preceding page. The column headings are reprinted on this page, so they are given here. Decimal points are faint or dropped by the scan in six cells; in each the surrounding column makes the intended value unambiguous and I transcribed the decimal point: row "4,000-4,999" CB "Percent by size class" (printed "1 1" = 1.1) and CC "Percent by size class" (printed "0 0" = 0.0); row "5,000-9,999" CE "Percent by size class" (printed "0 0" = 0.0) and CG "Percent by size class" (printed "3 0" = 3.0); row "Over 9,999" "Cumulative percent of all situations" (printed "99 9" = 99.9). Periods elsewhere in the table are likewise light but legible. The dashes in "CA-CB combinations" and in the row labels "4,000-4,999" and "5,000-9,999" are printed as short en-dashes; transcribed as plain hyphens. Leader dots after the row labels were dropped. Column 2 ("Total number of situations") and the stub heading are tall single cells open to the top rule, so they are repeated in all three heading levels; "Total" caps only the "Percent of all situations" and "Cumulative percent of all situations" columns. Footnote marker 2 is defined under the table but no cell on this crop carries it; it is attached somewhere on the earlier page of the table. The caption's superscript 1 is likewise on the omitted caption line. A stray ink mark sits above the stub heading at the top-left of the header box; it is scan noise, not text.