NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1988 › Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1988

Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1988

printed as Table 3C · source page 207 · nlrb1988_p0207_t0

Types of formal actions takenCases in which formal actions takenFormal actions taken by type of case
Types of formal actions takenCases in which formal actions takenACUC
Hearings completed88083
Decisions issued after hearing101194
By Regional Directors101194
By Board000
Transferred by Regional Directors for initial decision000
Review of Regional Directors' decisions:
Requests for review received34031
Withdrawn before request ruled upon101
Board action on requests ruled upon, total23022
Granted909
Denied14013
Remanded000
Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review000
Board decision after review, total000
Regional Directors' decisions:
Affirmed000
Modified000
Reversed000

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 See Glossary of terms for definitions.

0 of 18 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 207. Four printed columns: stub, "Cases in which formal actions taken" (a tall heading spanning both header levels), and AC / UC under the spanner "Formal actions taken by type of case". Apparent internal inconsistencies, transcribed as printed: in several rows the AC and UC figures do not sum to the "Cases in which formal actions taken" figure — "Hearings completed" 88 vs 0 + 83 = 83; "Decisions issued after hearing" 101 vs 1 + 94 = 95; "By Regional Directors" 101 vs 1 + 94 = 95; "Requests for review received" 34 vs 0 + 31 = 31; "Board action on requests ruled upon, total" 23 vs 0 + 22 = 22; "Denied" 14 vs 0 + 13 = 13. (Rows "Withdrawn before request ruled upon" and "Granted" do agree.) Nothing was computed or corrected. In the leader dots of the row label "Decisions issued after hearing" there is a small raised mark that could be read as a superscript 2, but the only footnote printed under the table is marker 1, and the mark sits in the middle of the leader dots rather than against the label text; I read it as a scan artifact / stray leader dot and did not transcribe it as a footnote marker. The row labels "By Board", "Affirmed", "Modified" and "Reversed" are followed by scattered leader dots and stray periods in the scan; only the label wording is transcribed.

Source image

Source page 207 of NLRB FY1988 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1988, p. 207.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.