NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1987 › Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1987
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | Formal actions taken by type of case | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | AC | UC |
| Hearings completed | 111 | 6 | 98 |
| Decisions issued after hearing | 121 | 6 | 107 |
| By Regional Directors | 116 | 6 | 103 |
| By Board | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Transferred by Regional Directors for initial decision | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Review of Regional Directors' decisions: | |||
| Requests for review received | 10 | 2 | 11 |
| Withdrawn before request ruled upon | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Board action on requests ruled upon, total | 15 | 2 | 11 |
| Granted | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| Denied | 7 | 1 | 5 |
| Remanded | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Board decision after review, total | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Regional Directors' decisions: | |||
| Affirmed | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Modified | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Reversed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0 of 32 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 208. Four printed columns: the stub, the single column "Cases in which formal actions taken", and the two columns AC and UC under the spanner "Formal actions taken by type of case". Several printed rows are internally inconsistent (AC + UC does not equal the "Cases in which formal actions taken" figure, and some subtotals do not add); all are transcribed exactly as printed, with no correction: Hearings completed 111 vs 6+98=104; Decisions issued after hearing 121 vs 6+107=113; By Regional Directors 116 vs 6+103=109; By Board 5 vs 0+4=4; Transferred by Regional Directors for initial decision 3 vs 0+2=2; Requests for review received 10 vs 2+11=13; Board action on requests ruled upon, total 15 vs 2+11=13, and its AC components 1+1+0=2 agree while UC 5+5+1=11 agrees, so the 15 in the first column conflicts with 6+7+2=15 only by coincidence of the first column's own parts; Affirmed 1 vs 0+2=2. These look like misprints or a different counting basis in the source, not transcription errors. A stray ink speck sits just left of the "2" in the UC column of the "Affirmed" row, and another small speck sits in the left margin beside the "Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review" / "Board decision after review, total" area; neither is read as a footnote marker or digit. The caption's footnote marker (1 on "Fiscal Year 1987") belongs to the excluded caption; the footnote text itself is retained.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.