NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1986 › Injunction Litigation Under Section 10(e), 10(j), and 10(l), Fiscal Year 1986

Injunction Litigation Under Section 10(e), 10(j), and 10(l), Fiscal Year 1986

printed as Table 20 · source page 282 · nlrb1986_p0282_t0

Total proceedingsInjunction proceedingsTotal dispositionsDisposition of injunctionsPending in district court Sept. 30, 1986
Total proceedingsPending in district court Oct. 1, 1985Filed in district court fiscal year 1986Total dispositionsGrantedDeniedSettledWithdrawnDismissedInactivePending in district court Sept. 30, 1986
Under Sec. 10(e) total20222000000
Under Sec. 10(j) total272252212161025
8(a)(1)(3)60640021012
8(a)(1)(3)(4)10110010000
8(a)(1)(3)(4)(5)10111000000
8(a)(1)(3)(5)12012127130010
8(a)(1)(5)20211000001
8(b)(1)32111000002
8(b)(1),8(a)(1)(3)(5)10111000000
8(g)10111000000
Under Sec. 10(l) total48840371721520111
8(b)(4)(A)11010010000
8(b)(4)(A)(B)10110010000
8(b)(4)(A)(B),8(e)00000000000
8(b)(4)(B)302282312172017
8(b)(4)(B)(D)10111000000
8(b)(4)(B),7(C)00000000000
8(b)(4)(B),8(e)10100000001
8(b)(4)(D)42242020000
8(b)(4)(D),7(C)11000000001
8(b)(7)(A)20220020000
8(b)(7)(B)10100000001
8(b)(7)(C)51442020001
8(e)11010100000

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 In courts of appeals

117 of 117 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 282. 12 columns: stub, Total proceedings, two Injunction proceedings columns, Total dispositions, six Disposition of injunctions columns, and the final Pending in district court Sept. 30, 1986 column. No stub heading is printed, so cell 0 of both heading levels is empty. The scan is a 1-bit image in which small dots are systematically lost (the headings render as "Injunctıon proceedıngs", "Pendıng", "Denıed" with dotless i's). On that basis I restored the abbreviation periods that are certainly in the print but not visible in the scan: "Sec." in the three total-row labels, and "Oct. 1, 1985" / "Sept. 30, 1986" in the headings. If strict glyph fidelity is wanted, those four periods are the only characters I added. Row "Under Sec. 10(e) total": the Total proceedings cell is printed as a small raised 1 immediately before the figure 2, i.e. footnote marker 1 on the value 2; transcribed as "2^1". All internal arithmetic checks out as printed (pending + filed = total proceedings; the six disposition columns sum to total dispositions; total proceedings - total dispositions = pending Sept. 30; and the detail rows under each of the 10(j) and 10(l) totals sum to those totals in every column), so no misprint is suspected. There is a small ink speck in the Inactive column on the "8(b)(1)" row, left of the printed 0; it is dirt, not a digit or marker. Row label "8(b)(4)(A)" (first detail row under the 10(l) total) is printed with a broken opening parenthesis after the 8 but is unambiguous.

Source image

Source page 282 of NLRB FY1986 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1986, p. 282.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.