NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1986 › Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1986 and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-1986

Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1986 and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-1986

printed as Table 19 · source page 280 · nlrb1986_p0280_t0

Fiscal year 1986July 5, 1937–Sept 30 1986
Number of proceedingsPercentagesJuly 5, 1937–Sept 30 1986
TotalVs employers onlyVs unions onlyVs both employers and unionsBoard dismissalVs employers onlyVs unions onlyVs both employers and unionsBoard dismissalNumberPercent
Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals21414060014
On petitions for review and/or enforcement19712954014100.0100.0100.09,293100.0
Board orders affirmed in full146105350681.464.842.95,99064.5
Board orders affirmed with modification1273025.45.614.21,35514.6
Remanded to Board1688006.214.80.04544.9
Board orders partially affirmed and partially remanded734002.37.40.01721.8
Board orders set aside1664064.77.442.91,32214.2
On petitions for contempt1711600100.0100.0
Compliance after filing of petition, before court order000000.00.0
Court orders holding respondent in contempt14950081.883.3
Court orders denying petition000000.00.0
Court orders directing compliance without contempt adjudication3210018.216.7
Contempt petitions withdrawn without compliance000000.00.0
Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court10001100.0243100.0
Board orders affirmed in full000000.014660.1
Board orders affirmed with modification00000187.4
Board orders set aside10001100.04116.9
Remanded to Board00000197.8
Remanded to court of appeals00000166.6
Board's request for remand or modification of enforcement order denied0000010.4
Contempt cases remanded to court of appeals0000010.4
Contempt cases enforced0000010.4

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 "Proceedings" are comparable to "cases" reported in annual reports prior to fiscal 1964. This term more accurately describes the data inasmuch as a single "proceeding" often includes more than one "case." See Glossary of terms for definitions.
  2. 2 A proceeding in which the Board had entered an order dismissing the complaint and the charging party appealed such dismissal in the courts of appeals.
  3. 3 The Board appeared as "amicus curiae" in 3 cases.

45 of 54 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 280. Twelve columns: stub, then five "Number of proceedings" columns and four "Percentages" columns under "Fiscal year 1986", then "Number" and "Percent" under "July 5, 1937–Sept 30 1986". Punctuation: this scan drops most periods. Every percentage is printed with a decimal point that did not survive scanning (the image shows e.g. "100 0", "81 4", "64 8"); I have restored the decimal points, and all restored values check out arithmetically — the five courts-of-appeals review lines sum to 100.0 in each of the four percentage columns (81.4+5.4+6.2+2.3+4.7; 64.8+5.6+14.8+7.4+7.4; 42.9+14.2+0.0+0.0+42.9; 64.5+14.6+4.9+1.8+14.2), as do the eight Supreme Court lines (60.1+7.4+16.9+7.8+6.6+0.4+0.4+0.4). For the same reason I wrote "U.S." in the two "Proceedings decided by..." stub labels, which the image renders as "U S", and restored sentence periods in footnote 1 ("fiscal 1964. This term..."; "...for definitions."). The column headings read "Vs" without a period in the image and are transcribed that way; the cumulative-column heading likewise shows no punctuation after "Sept 30" and is left as printed. Em-dash rules (printed as "——") are transcribed as empty cells throughout the percentage and cumulative columns. Counts are internally consistent: 140+60+0+14 = 214; 197+17 = 214; the five review lines sum to the 197/129/54/0/14 subtotal row; the five contempt lines sum to 17/11/6/0/0; cumulative Number columns sum to 9,293 and 243 respectively. The "Vs both employers and unions" percentage column (column 8) is blank in every body row — all dash rules. The stub column carries no printed heading in the header block, so header cell 0 is empty on all three levels. Indentation marks the hierarchy (section lines "Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals" and "Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court^3" at the left margin, subtotal lines "On petitions for review and/or enforcement" and "On petitions for contempt" one level in, detail lines two levels in); indentation is not reproduced in the labels.

Source image

Source page 280 of NLRB FY1986 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1986, p. 280.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.