NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1986 › Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1986 and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-1986
| Fiscal year 1986 | July 5, 1937–Sept 30 1986 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of proceedings | Percentages | July 5, 1937–Sept 30 1986 | |||||||||
| Total | Vs employers only | Vs unions only | Vs both employers and unions | Board dismissal | Vs employers only | Vs unions only | Vs both employers and unions | Board dismissal | Number | Percent | |
| Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals | 214 | 140 | 60 | 0 | 14 | ||||||
| On petitions for review and/or enforcement | 197 | 129 | 54 | 0 | 14 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 9,293 | 100.0 | |
| Board orders affirmed in full | 146 | 105 | 35 | 0 | 6 | 81.4 | 64.8 | 42.9 | 5,990 | 64.5 | |
| Board orders affirmed with modification | 12 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 14.2 | 1,355 | 14.6 | |
| Remanded to Board | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 | 14.8 | 0.0 | 454 | 4.9 | |
| Board orders partially affirmed and partially remanded | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2.3 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 172 | 1.8 | |
| Board orders set aside | 16 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 4.7 | 7.4 | 42.9 | 1,322 | 14.2 | |
| On petitions for contempt | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||
| Compliance after filing of petition, before court order | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Court orders holding respondent in contempt | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 81.8 | 83.3 | ||||
| Court orders denying petition | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Court orders directing compliance without contempt adjudication | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18.2 | 16.7 | ||||
| Contempt petitions withdrawn without compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0 | 243 | 100.0 | |||
| Board orders affirmed in full | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 146 | 60.1 | |||
| Board orders affirmed with modification | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 7.4 | ||||
| Board orders set aside | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0 | 41 | 16.9 | |||
| Remanded to Board | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 7.8 | ||||
| Remanded to court of appeals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 6.6 | ||||
| Board's request for remand or modification of enforcement order denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.4 | ||||
| Contempt cases remanded to court of appeals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.4 | ||||
| Contempt cases enforced | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.4 | ||||
45 of 54 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 280. Twelve columns: stub, then five "Number of proceedings" columns and four "Percentages" columns under "Fiscal year 1986", then "Number" and "Percent" under "July 5, 1937–Sept 30 1986". Punctuation: this scan drops most periods. Every percentage is printed with a decimal point that did not survive scanning (the image shows e.g. "100 0", "81 4", "64 8"); I have restored the decimal points, and all restored values check out arithmetically — the five courts-of-appeals review lines sum to 100.0 in each of the four percentage columns (81.4+5.4+6.2+2.3+4.7; 64.8+5.6+14.8+7.4+7.4; 42.9+14.2+0.0+0.0+42.9; 64.5+14.6+4.9+1.8+14.2), as do the eight Supreme Court lines (60.1+7.4+16.9+7.8+6.6+0.4+0.4+0.4). For the same reason I wrote "U.S." in the two "Proceedings decided by..." stub labels, which the image renders as "U S", and restored sentence periods in footnote 1 ("fiscal 1964. This term..."; "...for definitions."). The column headings read "Vs" without a period in the image and are transcribed that way; the cumulative-column heading likewise shows no punctuation after "Sept 30" and is left as printed. Em-dash rules (printed as "——") are transcribed as empty cells throughout the percentage and cumulative columns. Counts are internally consistent: 140+60+0+14 = 214; 197+17 = 214; the five review lines sum to the 197/129/54/0/14 subtotal row; the five contempt lines sum to 17/11/6/0/0; cumulative Number columns sum to 9,293 and 243 respectively. The "Vs both employers and unions" percentage column (column 8) is blank in every body row — all dash rules. The stub column carries no printed heading in the header block, so header cell 0 is empty on all three levels. Indentation marks the hierarchy (section lines "Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals" and "Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court^3" at the left margin, subtotal lines "On petitions for review and/or enforcement" and "On petitions for contempt" one level in, detail lines two levels in); indentation is not reproduced in the labels.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.