Analysis of Methods of Disposition of Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1986

p. 249. Three columns: an unlabeled stub plus two data columns headed "AC" and "UC"; the stub has no printed heading, so cell 0 of the single header row is empty. Row labels are indented into a hierarchy (Total, all; then the three disposition categories Certification amended or unit clarified / Dismissed / Withdrawn, each with Before hearing and After hearing sub-rows, which in turn have By Regional Director's decision and By Board decision sub-rows). The indentation is not preserved in the grid, so several labels repeat verbatim under different parents. No footnotes are printed under the table. The scan renders many lowercase "i" characters without their dots (e.g., "Certification", "Dismissed", "decision"), but the words are unambiguous. Printed figures are internally consistent: AC 11+11+2 = 24 and UC 48+131+191 = 370, matching the "Total, all" row.