NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1984 › Representation Elections in Which Objections and/or Determinative Challenges Were Ruled On in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1984

Representation Elections in Which Objections and/or Determinative Challenges Were Ruled On in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1984

printed as Table 11B · source page 214 · nlrb1984_p0214_t0

Total electionsObjections onlyChallenges onlyObjections and challengesTotal objectionsTotal challenges
Total electionsNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercent
All representation elections4,56759313.02515.51793.977217.04309.5
By type of case
In RC cases3,44748314.12005.81534.563610.635310.3
In RM cases2322711.6146.062.63314.2208.6
In RD cases888839.3374.2202.310311.6576.4
By type of election
Consent elections1451510.396.232.11812.4128.3
Stipulated elections3,71544812.11875.11313.557915.73188.6
Expedited elections000000
Regional director-directed elections67812518.4558.1436.316824.89814.5
Board-directed elections29517.200.026.9724.126.9

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 Number of elections in which objections were ruled on, regardless of number of allegations in each election
  2. 2 Number of elections in which challengers were ruled on, regardless of individual ballots challenged in each election

24 of 47 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 214. DECIMAL POINTS RESTORED. The scan is heavily thresholded and has lost small dots throughout: every lower-case "i" in the body and footnotes prints dotless ("electıons", "Stıpulated", "ın whıch"), and the decimal point in every Percent cell is likewise missing, leaving a gap ("13 0", "5 5"). I have written these cells as one-decimal percentages (13.0, 5.5, ...) since the gap marks where the point was printed; no cell was rounded or recomputed. DOUBTFUL CELL: "In RC cases", Total objections^1 / Percent. The glyphs read as "10 6" and I have transcribed 10.6, but this is almost certainly an eroded "18 6" (= 18.6): 636/3,447 = 18.4, and the column cannot average to the printed 17.0 for all elections if RC (three-quarters of the table) were 10.6 while RM is 14.2 and RD 11.6; 18.6 reproduces 17.0 exactly. The same ink loss that removed the i-dots and decimal points would turn an 8 into a 0. PERCENTS APPEAR COMPUTED ON BASES 20 LOWER THAN THE PRINTED TOTALS. Three Total-elections figures — 4,567 (all elections), 3,447 (RC) and 3,715 (stipulated) — are each exactly 20 above the base implied by their own percent row. Using 4,547, 3,427 and 3,695 every percent in those three rows reproduces to the printed tenth (e.g. 772/4,547 = 17.0, 430/4,547 = 9.5; 483/3,427 = 14.1, 636/3,427 = 18.6, 353/3,427 = 10.3; 187/3,695 = 5.1, 579/3,695 = 15.7), whereas the printed totals give 16.9, 9.4, 14.0, 10.2, 5.0, 15.6. The printed totals are internally consistent (RC+RM+RD = 4,567 and the five election types = 4,567), as are the implied bases (3,427+232+888 = 4,547; 145+3,695+678+29 = 4,547), so this looks like a late +20 revision to the RC / stipulated counts with the percent columns not recomputed. I have transcribed the totals as printed. The RM, RD, consent, expedited, regional-director and Board-directed rows all reconcile exactly with no such shift. Footnote 2 reads "challengers were ruled on"; this is likely a misprint for "challenges", but it is transcribed as printed. The stub column carries no printed heading, so cell 0 of both heading levels is empty. "Total elections" is a single tall heading spanning both levels and is repeated in each.

Source image

Source page 214 of NLRB FY1984 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1984, p. 214.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.