NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1984 › Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1984
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | Formal actions taken by type of case | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Types of formal actions taken | Cases in which formal actions taken | AC | UC |
| Hearings completed | 114 | 7 | 106 |
| Decisions issued after hearing | 116 | 6 | 108 |
| By regional directors | 107 | 6 | 97 |
| By Board | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Transferred by regional directors for initial decision | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| Review of regional directors' decisions | |||
| Requests for review received | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| Withdrawn before request ruled upon | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Board action on requests ruled upon, total | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Granted | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Denied | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Remanded | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrawn after request granted, before Board review | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Board decision after review, total | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Regional directors' decisions | |||
| Affirmed | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Modified | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reversed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0 of 25 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 193. Four columns: stub plus "Cases in which formal actions taken", then "AC" and "UC" under the spanner "Formal actions taken by type of case". Several rows do not add across as printed (AC + UC does not equal the first column): Hearings completed 7 + 106 = 113 vs 114; Decisions issued after hearing 6 + 108 = 114 vs 116; By regional directors 6 + 97 = 103 vs 107; Transferred by regional directors for initial decision 0 + 7 vs 8; Requests for review received 0 + 7 vs 8; Granted 0 + 2 vs 3; Denied 0 + 1 vs 2. All values are transcribed exactly as printed and nothing was computed or corrected; the first column counts cases while the AC/UC columns count actions by case type, so the mismatch may be intended, but it may also indicate dropped or misprinted digits in the original. The stub holds an outline of indented sub-items ("By regional directors", "Granted", "Affirmed", etc.); indentation is not representable in the grid, so labels are given with their printed wording only. "Review of regional directors' decisions" and "Regional directors' decisions" are section lines with no values. The scan is slightly degraded: many lowercase "i" characters have lost their dots (e.g. "Hearings", "decisions"), and the digit 1 in "Affirmed" / "Board decision after review, total" prints as a bare vertical stroke; both read unambiguously in context. A stray ink mark appears in the right margin beside the "Regional directors' decisions" row and is not part of the table. The table caption ("Table 3C.—Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1984", carrying footnote marker 1) is omitted per instructions.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.