Miscellaneous Litigation Involving NLRB; Outcome of Proceedings in Which Court Decision Issued in Fiscal Year 1983

p. 234. Single panel, 10 columns (stub + 3 court groups x 3 columns). The stub heading "Type of litigation" and each "Number decided" column heading are tall headings repeated down the heading levels; "Court determination" spans the "Upholding Board position" and "Contrary to Board position" pair in each group. Row-label indentation (not reproducible in the grid) marks the hierarchy: "To enforce subpoena" through "To prevent conflict between NLRA and Bankruptcy Code" sit under "NLRB-initiated actions or interventions"; "To review non-final orders" and "To restrain NLRB from" under "Action by other parties"; "Proceeding in R case" through "Filing of Proof of Claim in BK" under "To restrain NLRB from"; and "Issue complaint" through "Other", plus the final two rows, under "To compel NLRB to". "To restrain NLRB from" and "To compel NLRB to" are section labels that also carry values, so they are transcribed with their printed numbers. Arithmetic as printed is consistent: 5 + 34 + 12 = 51 for the "Number decided" total, and the sub-items of "To compel NLRB to" (4 + 0 + 4 + 2 + 1 + 1) sum to 12, i.e. the last two rows ("To pay fees under Equal Access to Justice Act", "To comply with Privacy Act") belong to that block even though the second is printed with deeper indentation than the first. A small stray ink mark (resembling an apostrophe) sits in the "Issue complaint" row just inside the left rule of the "In district courts / Number decided" column; it is a scanning artifact, not a digit or footnote marker. The superscript 1 on "Comply with Freedom of Information Act" is the only footnote marker in the table. All digits are clearly legible; no cell was doubtful and nothing appears cut off by the crop.